bridgestone tour b330 s compression

Plugged-In-Golf-White-on-Blue-e1597419240829

Get plugged in…

Bridgestone Tour B330, B330-S, B3330-RX, B330-RXS Golf Ball Review

50 Words or Less

The most complete line up of Tour-level golf balls on the market. An option for every swing speed and player preference.

Introduction

When I say that Bridgestone’s Tour B330 family is the most complete in the game, it’s not hyperbole, it’s fact. What other line up has a ball that perfectly fits PGA Tour winners like Matt Kuchar and Brandt Snedeker, LPGA winners like Paula Creamer and Karrie Webb, as well as the thousands of recreational golfers who buy them in pro shops every week? By offering a matrix of fitting options for high and low spin and high and low swing speed players, Bridgestone is assured that every golfer can be fit into a Tour B330 ball.

Each ball in the Tour B330 family has a unique feel. The B330 is the firmest, with a nice “thock” off the putter. The softest is the B330-RXS which comes off with a more mushy, buttery “thud.” The B330-S and B330-RX have distinct feels, but it’s hard to definitively say which is softer. The B330-RX feels similar to the B330, but just marginally softer. The B330-S has more of a “thud” like the B330-RXS, but just a touch firmer.

In all honesty, if you like any ball in this family, you could probably be happy playing any other ball. Each one is easily recognizable as a first-tier tour ball, and it’s only on close examination that you can pinpoint the differences in sound and feel between each one.

For long game testing, I hit each ball on a launch monitor with a driver, hybrid, and a long iron. What I found was perfectly in line with my expectations and past experience with the Bridgestone Tour B330 series. The B330 was the lowest spinning and firmest. It’s the ball that’s designed for the big hitter who wants maximum distance. For me, the B330-S spun just slightly more and was nearly equal to the B330-RX. The B330-RXS spun the most and had the softest feel off the long clubs.

In terms of ball speed, the difference between the standard and RX models was negligible for me. However, I’m a poor example of the differences between the two types as my swing speed is very near the dividing line of 105 MPH. For players with swing speeds substantially above that threshold, ball speeds should be higher with the B330 and B330-S. I had some players with slower swing speeds (90MPH and below) try these balls with their drivers and they got significantly better returns from the RX and RXS.

In the short game, the “S” balls really separated themselves from the B330 and B330-RX: both spun measurably more on full and partial wedge shots. Though the difference was clear on the launch monitor, it was less noticeable on the course. The B330-S definitely feels softer and checked up a little faster than the B330, but it was not as if one spun back and the other ran out.

If you’re a skilled player, I would recommend judging the short game ability of these balls on feel as much as launch monitor spin numbers because any of these balls is more than capable of performing any short game shot. Though the B330-S and B330-RXS did post higher spin numbers, players who prefer a firmer feel off their wedges should opt for the B330 and B330-RX.

Who This Ball Is For

Anyone who wants to play a Tour ball but doesn’t want to compromise on distance. There’s a ball in this line up for every player, from the high speed, high spin bomber (B330) to the lower speed player who wants every last RPM (B330-RXS).

To find the perfect Tour B330 model for you, Bridgestone offers a couple of good options. To find a free, live fitting, check out their calendar of events ( HERE ) to see if they’re coming to your area. If you can’t make it to an in person fitting, there’s the online Golf Ball Selection Guide ( HERE ) which is pretty slick. You input some basic information (driver distance, average score, etc) and, based on their fitting database (250,000+ fittings and counting), they make 3 recommendations. Next to each recommendation, they display the percentage of golfers like you who were fit into each ball. The online tool fit me to my favorite Tour B330 model, the Tour B330-S.

If you want a tour caliber golf ball that will let you dial in exactly the feel and amount of spin you want in addition to being fit for your swing speed, the Bridgestone Tour B330 family is your best option. No other golf balls deliver tour performance for amateur-level swing speeds like the B330-RX and B330-RXS, and you need look no further than the hottest golfer on the planet, Matt Kuchar, to see how well the B330-S performs on the world’s biggest stage.

Buy Bridgestone Golf Balls HERE

20 Comments

Hi there Matt,

I have been playing whatever ball I could find and now want to start using one ball exclusively. Obviously, the Pro V1 / V1x have been recommended, but I don’t like the price tag. Would you say these Bridgestones (esp B330 and B330S), if properly fit, are the same in performance?

The Bridgestones are every bit as good as the Titleists.

Matt, could you give me more info/specs on then B330RX versus the RX S model balls. (Is Bridgestone still making the “S”?

The main differences are feel and a small amount of short game spin. I would just play the one you like the feel of.

Yes, the S is still in the line up.

Thanks, Matt. ( So “S” is for spin not “soft”….can be confusing these days.)

Is there a difference between the Bridgestone RXS’s that have the name “Bridgestone Golf” vs. the “B” logo? I’ve bought both online and they are in the same new packaging. Both claim to be 2016/2017 version.

I haven’t seen any of the new versions with “Bridgestone Golf” on the ball, but I would tend to trust the packaging (that they’re all the same ball) assuming they were bought from somewhere reputable.

Which ball is comparable to the e7? TrueType disappointed that they are becoming hard to purchase.

There’s nothing in the B330 line that I would compare to the e7. They’re two very different lines of balls.

Follow-up to my May 7th question: According to Bridgestone, the B330RXS”s that I’ve purchased in the same new 2016/2017 packaging are the SAME ball with different printing. At some point the older “Bridgestone Golf” lettering was changed to the new “B” logo. The balls are the same.

Thanks for the info!

I have been using the “S” ball for years and I love it. I have yet to try the “RXS” however. As far as distance off the tee goes, would you say the “S” ball is longer than the “RXS?” I’m a fairly long hitter but sometimes have trouble having spin on my short irons. So I’m thinking about giving the “RXS” a try.

Whether the S or RXS is longer depends on how it fits the individual. The only way to know is to try a sleeve for yourself.

What is the difference in tour rxs (new red box) and Rxs (silver box) both have the “B’ logo not the “bridgestone”. I was looking for the silver box but could only find the older box with the “bridgstone” logo. So I bought the red box that says Tour Rxs and does not spin on greens as well for me.

It seems like you’re referring to the Tour B: https://pluggedingolf.com/bridgestone-tour-b-x-tour-b-xs-tour-b-rx-tour-b-rxs-golf-ball-review/

Hey Matt, Thanks for all your good info man. I like how you mad it so simple to read and understand. I have one question. Can you let me demo a sleeve of the rxs b330’s? If I like them I will buy two dozen?

I don’t have any RXS left. I’m sure you can buy a sleeve at your local golf shop, though.

I would like a comparison between the B and the B330 lines, please. Do each have the same amount and pattern of dimples? The 330 line is less expensive, I think because I do not believe they have a urethane cover. Please advise.

The B330 line is the older version of what is now called the Tour B, that’s why it’s less money. Both are urethane covered. I’m not sure about the dimple patterns.

I really benefited from here through ths good post, thanks

Plugged In Golf

Do You Like Free Golf Gear?

Sign up for our weekly newsletter and not only will you get the latest reviews, instruction, and more delivered directly to your inbox, you’ll also be entered into regular giveaways for golf clubs and more.

Bridgestone Golf Ball Compression Chart and Rank

Bridgestone is not just the choice of Tiger Woods, Bryson DeChambeau and Lexi Thompson golfers. It is also the right choice for golfers looking for performance and a good price.

Bridgestone has a wide range of balls to suit different golfers, from the low compression B330, B330-S, e5, e7, to the medium compression e6 soft for beginners, the lady series for ladies and the tour BX for higher speeds. There are many more. Let me give you a list of the compression charts of Bridgestone balls and the people they are suitable for to help you in your choice.

Other Brands Golf Ball Compression Chart

by kansasgolf.org

Best Overall: Bridgestone Tour B XS “Three-piece construction; REACTIV urethane cover; Dual dimple technology; Mid compression (85); Two colors; Twelve balls a pack.”
Best Price: 2021 Bridgestone e6 “Two pieces; Surlyn cover; Larger softcore; Low compression (50); Two colors; Twelve balls a pack.”
Best for Seniors: 2021 Bridgestone e12 Contact “Three-piece golf balls; Ionomer cover; New contact force dimples; REACTIV cover technology; Four colors; Twelve balls a pack.”
Best for Beginners: Bridgestone e6 Soft “Three-piece structure; Surlyn cover; Ultra-low compression (44); Delta dimples design; Two colors; Twelve balls a pack.”
Best for Distance: Bridgestone 2020 Tour B RX “Three-piece construction; REACTIV urethane cover; Dual dimple technology; Mid compression (75); Two colors; Twelve balls a pack.”
Best for High Swing Speeds: Bridgestone 2020 Tour B X “Three pieces; REACTIV urethane cover; Dual dimple technology; High compression (98); White color; Twelve balls a pack.”
Best for Slice: Bridgestone 2020 Tour B RXS “Three-piece structure; REACTIV urethane cover; Dual dimple technology; Mid compression (75); Two colors; Twelve balls a pack.”
Best for Ladies: Bridgestone 2019 e6 Lady “Two pieces; Thin ionomer cover; Delta dimple design; Ultra-low compression (40); Two colors; Twelve balls a pack.”

Bridgestone Golf Ball Compression Chart

What you want to know about Bridgestone golf ball is here!

Reviews from authoritative websites and sharing

MYGOLFSPY -BEST BRIDGESTONE GOLF BALLS OF 2022
BRIDGESTONE -BRIDGESTONE GOLF BALL FITTING

Best golf irons – comparison chart for 2023 report, adams golf idea tech hybrid irons review, saplize golf grips: elevate your game with the right grips, callaway golf balls compression chart and rank, 2022 golf ball compression chart and rank.

Your cart is empty.

Return To Shop

Estimate Shipping

Postal/Zip Code

Add A Coupon

Coupon code will work on checkout page

Disclosure: When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more>

Bridgestone B330 Golf Ball Review

For years, Bridgestone has carved a niche in the crowded golf ball market by offering a golf ball with Tour-like feel and consistency to those of us who cannot generate Tour-level clubhead speed. Having someone like Tiger Woods playing the ball in competition cements the brand’s credibility but what sets Bridgestone apart from other competitors is its myriad options in the B330 series and revolutionary ball-fitting system, fueled by a massive database of golf swings compiled that includes golfers of all shapes, sizes and abilities. Let’s take a closer look at the four golf balls available in the Bridgestone 330 series.

Key Features

The unique dimple-inside-a-dimple pattern for each of the 330 dimples on the Bridgestone golf ball creates tremendous stability through the wind. These balls were designed for golfers with clubhead speeds of 105 MPH or higher. The bomber who generates tremendous spin.

This golf ball is designed with the player who wants distance, routinely finds the center of the clubface with his strikes.

The B330 has the player who can generate enough spin on his own. On full shots, there’s not a discernable difference, although it’s produced lower spin rates off the driver for some golfers

The ball reacts well around the green, but the louder sound might be a turnoff for some players. It’s in the medium range compared to other balls as it pertains to short game performance.

Excellent. Multiple rounds can be played with this golf ball – assuming you don’t deposit it in a lake or the backyard of a large dog.

Bridgestone B330S Golf Ball Review

Also offers 330 dimples, and the unique dimple-in-a-dimple pattern. This golf ball provides the best of both worlds. Used by PGA tour players such as Matt Kuchar, the increased spin can be beneficial.

Golfers who swing above 105 MPH clubhead speed should benefit from using this golf ball. It’s made for power.

This ball has the requisite spin that good golfers seek. In general, it spins slightly more than the B330 but still at a level that’s within reason. It should help players who naturally produce a low spin rate with their swing.

As compared to the B330 (and that’s really the primary comparison for this golf ball due to the spin rates and applicable clubhead speed) this ball should feel slightly softer and react in a positive manner around the greens. It has a slightly ‘quieter’ sound and softer feel on chips, pitches and putts, in some ways comparable to the Pro VI.

Top-end golf balls have progressively become more and more durable over time, which is a relief to our collective wallets. The B330S will go the distance, 18 holes and beyond.

Bridgestone B330 RX Golf Ball Review

The B330RX changed the entire golf ball market when it was introduced in 2008. The concept of providing a Tour level ball for amateur swing speeds seemed ridiculous and improbable to accomplish. How did Bridgestone pull off this trick? They designed a AMATOURCore, which they claim increases ball speed and leads to distance for most players who swing less than 105 MPH. Bridgestone’s studies prove the AMATOUR is 28 percent softer than other Tour caliber golf balls.

The company also claims that the SlipRes cover, another innovation, enables golfers to have exceptional feel on short shots which require maximum touch.

“The claims we’re making may seem unbelievable, and I wouldn’t have believed them myself if I heard them without having witnessed them firsthand in our R&D testing,” said Adam Rehberg, Golf Ball Marketing – Bridgestone Golf, Inc. “We witnessed significant distance increases over major competitors in robot testing, while providing improved greenside spin. The truth of the matter is these balls perform better than anything currently on the market for swing speeds below 105 mph and golfers will notice immediately when they put them in play.”

If your swing is slowing down and you’ve been looking for length in all the wrong places, the B330RX golf ball is probably the one for you. This ball, and its compression level around 80 allows golfers with slower swing speeds to “get to the center of the ball”, compress it and watch it fly off the clubface. This is a great ball for those who aren’t interested in working their tee shots left-to-right or right-to-left, and prefer instead to swing for the fences with a full bore move.

The spin level of this ball is adequate. The cover is designed to reduce spin on the driver. It’s not the softest ball Bridgestone offers but it’s competitive in this area across the board.

Ball reacts nicely. Softer than the B330 or B330S, providing a nice blend of sound and feel.

Bridgestone claims this golf ball’s cover has ‘innovative self-repairing formulation,’ which sounds ridiculous and brings to mind an image of golf played by aliens in outer space. We’re going to take their word for it, sort of, not really, and just say that the ball is durable and able to withstand the typical scuffs, scrapes and bruises it receives during its normal life cycle. We’ve come a long way since Balata, baby.

Bridgestone B330RXS Golf Ball Review

Just like it’s cousin, the B330RX, the B330RXS offers the Gradient Core Technology that creates a smoother transfer of energy from the club to the ball and should equal increased power for most golfers. The SlipRes cover and AMATOUR core are two other features designed specifically with those who possess clubhead speeds less than 105 MPH in mind. Bridgestone claims the SlipRes cover reduces spin on tee shots – leading to more distance – and increases spin on wedges and short shots – leading to better feel and accuracy. That’s a bold statement, but if they have indeed accomplished this feat, than the B330RXS stands alone as an attractive option for most amateur golfers.

Not sure how Bridgestone executed this exactly, but this ball is long. It leaves nothing on the tee box and reacts particularly well into the wind.

Terrific. Just the right amount. Less on the long shots and more on the short ones.

Perhaps the best of all of Bridgestone’s offerings in this department. This ball will get down in a hurry. Unleash your full arsenal of Phil Mickelson inspired flop shots. Pitch the ball like Steve Stricker or Paula Creamer. Putt like Karrie Webb in her prime. This ball feels great on a wedge or putter.

See above. Bridgestone claims the cover repairs itself. Pretty cool. Would love to watch this unfold on footage shot by a super high speed, high resolution camera.

Which one is Right for Me?

Oh, you had to ask didn’t you? The beauty of this question is the simplicity of the answer. If an actual ball-fitting on a driving range with Bridgestone peeps monitoring your every swing is unavailable, simply venture your fingers over to the Bridgestone official website. And answer a few questions here: https://www.bridgestonegolf.com/en-us/find-my-ball/ball-selector-tool#/ Within a matter of seconds, this handy-dandy feature will collect your age, gender, ability and preferences to form an educated choice on which ball fits your game best. Even still, here are some ground rules.

Is your clubhead speed 105 MPH or higher? If so, and you are a player who consistently strikes the center of the clubface and power is what you crave the B330 is the ball for you. If exceptional precision approaching the greens is your desire, with increased touch around the putting surfaces, than buy yourself a sleeve of B330S golf balls – and be like Tiger (and Matt).

If your clubhead speed is 105 MPH or less, you’re in luck, Bridgestone offers two delicious options. The B330RX is slightly harder and louder than the B330 model, but again that’s one of those intangible characteristics best determined by personal preference. Keep in mind the RX has relatively low spin off the irons and slightly less spin around the greens as well. But again those differences are marginal. We’d have a hard time not recommending the B330RXS for almost any amateur golfer who swings the club around 100 MPH or less. It gives a little bit of everything – power, control, touch, strong flight in the wind. This ball is a valuable member of the Bridgestone family.

Are the Bridgestone balls really as good as the other guys?

On the surface, it’s only natural to compare the Bridgestone B330 golf ball to the Titleist Pro VIX . They are the harder of the two golf balls offered by those respective companies. Likewise, the B330S and the Titleist Pro VI are cut from the same softer cover. If you’re already playing one of the Titleist models, it is in your best interest to take the comparable Bridgestone out on the course for a round of comparison golfing. The biggest point to take away from the world of Bridgestone, is it’s OK to live in the RX world if your swing speeds are declining or never made it to Tour standards in the first place. And the best part is you don’t have to sacrifice the touch, feel, spin and sound required to play the scoring shots around the green.

Just from a feel perspective the B330RXS and the Callaway Chrome Soft are quite comparable.

For a review of all the golf balls currently on the market, click here .

These Bridgestone golf balls are excellent. They have used their extensive research and development time and money to craft golf balls that appeal to the everyman and everywoman, the recreational golfers who serve as the backbone of the sport. By signing an array of top golfers from both men’s and women’s professional tours to play and endorse their golf ball, there’s no stigma attached to playing a Bridgestone either. None at all. In fact, what many golfers can look forward to is longer drives, more birdie putts and lower scores.

Review: Bridgestone B330 & B330-s Balls

I decided that I would use their online fitting survey to pick the ball for me. After inputting all my information, it spit out that I should be playing the …..(I’ll tell you at the end)

Bridgestone has a wide variety of balls for various swing speeds and swing needs. I’ve played Bridgestone balls before and I knew that I needed either the B330 or the B330-S. My swing speed is too high for the B-330 RX or RXS. I seemed to over compress those balls and they just didn’t go anywhere for me. (Great balls for slower swing speeds by the way)

So I took out the new Tour B-330 to give it a spin. I noticed instantly that it is a fairly firm ball and really likes high-speed swings to compress. When the club brings the heat, the ball jumps off its face like a rocket and just goes. I don’t know if there is a longer ball out there. I had some very long drives with this ball. Off the irons it was more of the same, bring the heat, get rewarded, slower swings were kind of hard. Around the greens the spin was moderate and controllable. It is on the lower side of premium balls so if you are using non-conforming grooves you will get just the right amount. The putter found this ball to be just a tad clicky. It putted well just popped off the face quickly.

Playing also that day as the B-330S – (a head to head competition). This one was noticeably softer even off the driver. It felt like it stayed on the face longer and didn’t need quite the speed to compress. For my game I found it to be a little straighter, while that may have to do with a more controlled swing too, but either way I found a few more fairways with this one, although it was a few yards behind the B-330. Off the irons is was a pro, it jumped off with a soft feel and then spun very nicely staying put where I hit it. Off wedges there was also noticeably more spin, allowing even conforming grooves to spin nicely around the green. On the putting surface you could once again tell the difference in feel. It is simply a softer ball. It felt like it stayed on the putter face longer too because of that soft feel.

In the head to head competition, the B-330 was longer, firmer and spun less, but I scored better and approached closer with the B-330 S. I found both balls to be rather durable. I think the new grooves help, but Bridgestone has always done a good job of making a very durable urethane cover. The only scuffing came from the cart path, and no ball can withstand that. While these are the newest version of Bridgestone balls , they aren’t a drastic change from previous versions. This can be both a positive and a negative. If you like the older versions, you won’t be disappointed, but if you are looking from some very different you won’t find that either. The core is said to be a new compound, but to the naked eye you can’t tell.

I bet you’d never guess which ball Bridgestone’s online fitting suggested—That’s right the B-330 S. I have a feeling they’ve got this ball fitting down. If you swing for the fences (and reach them) the B-330 is for you, but for my game the B-330 S is a perfect fit.

Check the price online here

For more information: www.bridgestonegolf.com

Quick Hits +Online Ball Fitting +Durable +Variety of ball to fit needs

–Not a major change over previous versions (can be a positive too)

You are now an official member of IGR. Keep an eye out for the perks.

No spam, ever. 🔒

About Us Submit Your Product Contact

Full Disclosure Privacy Policy Terms and Conditions

Ball Reviews

Bridgestone b330/b330s ball review.

Bridgestone showcases their redesigned B330 golf ball line for 2012. Video below!

Price: $43/dozen

Golf Digest Gold Medal Hotlist winner:

Performance: 4.5 stars Innovation: 5 stars Feel: 4.5 stars Demand: 3 stars

Tech Talk: As of this year, all four models use a dual-dimple design aimed at reducing drag at launch (for more speed) and increasing lift later in flight (for longer carry). The B330 and B330-S use a softer, thinner urethane cover to improve feel and distance; the RX models feature a softer ionomer blend in the mantle layer designed to reduce sidespin.

Verdict: Bridgestone still makes the best case for using non-tour-speed balls (not that its elite balls are slouches, though). Still, even our fastest swingers liked the feel of the RXS best.

TOUR B330 Technology

Tour Performance optimized for pro level swing speeds over 105 mph with a preference for maximum TOUR DISTANCE.

The NEW Tour B330 features a larger core, softer cover and Bridgestone’s proprietary Dual Dimple Technology. The new Dual Dimple offers superior aerodynamics and enhanced wind performance while the larger core produces faster ball speed for longer distance. The Urethane cover, now 6% softer than the previous model, also offers enhanced greenside spin control. Features 2012 Golf Digest Hot List Gold Medal

Gradational compression core technology for increased ball speed Dual Mantle design for reduced spin and higher launch off the driver and long irons Tour proven Urethane cover for excellent greenside control 330 dual dimple technology for a consistent flight

TaylorMade Penta TP5 Ball

Titleist ProV1 / ProV1X Ball Review

GolfWRX is the world's largest and best online golf community. Expert editorial reviews, breaking golf tour and industry news, what to play, how to play and where to play. GolfWRX surrounds consumers throughout the buying, learning and enrichment process from original photographic and video content, to peer to peer advice and camaraderie, to technical how-tos, and more. As the largest online golf community we continue to protect the purity of our members opinions and the platform to voice them. We want to protect the interests of golfers by providing an unbiased platform to feel proud to contribute to for years to come. You can follow GolfWRX on Twitter @GolfWRX and on Facebook .

OVER THE TOP GOLF

Oct 3, 2013 at 5:39 pm

There will never be a better golf ball than the original Maxfli A-10s but Bridgestone B330/330s are as good as you’ll find out of the current crop.

Pingback: Bridgestone B330/B330S Ball | Augusta Blog

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed .

Is the Future of Golf Balls Lower Spin?

For years now, TaylorMade has been preaching lower spin to create more distance, especially in its drivers. Its original SLDR driver was actually so low spinning that TaylorMade encouraged golfers to try higher-lofted club heads, or to “loft up,” so golf balls wouldn’t dive out of the air. Now, when you look around at the popular drivers in the industry, most of them are designed to lower spin. TaylorMade was ahead of the curve.

With its new TP5 and TP5x golf balls, TaylorMade is pushing a similar initiative: lower spin on all full shots.

“This ball is different. You can make the argument this is too hot a golf ball for people who don’t spin it (enough). But that’s not the large percentage of golfers.”

For driver shots, it’s easy to understand the benefit of lower spin as long as the golfer launches it high enough. Low spin plus high launch equals more distance; that’s just a math equation. But with golf balls, as opposed to drivers, their jobs are also to get close to the hole, not just go as far and straight possible. With that in mind, is lower spin necessarily beneficial on ALL full shots, including the irons?

For Jon Rahm and Rory McIlroy, who both switched to TaylorMade TP5x golf ball this season — the lower-spinning and slightly firmer-feeling golf ball in the TP5 line — the answer is clearly “yes.” Rahm saw an 800 rpm drop in iron spin with a 4-iron compared to his Titleist’s Pro V1x golf ball and a 400 rpm drop in driver spin, according to TaylorMade. McIlroy saw up to 10 yards in extra distance with a 5-iron, and he picked up distance with the driver, as well. According to Eric Loper, Director of Golf Ball R&D at TaylorMade, McIlroy was hitting his 7 iron at 16.1 degrees of launch with 6350 rpm, and his 4 iron at 11.1 degrees of launch with 3800 rpm during his initial Trackman testing at The Bear’s Club.

“(With a 7 iron) you have to hit it about 7000 (rpm) or less, and he was hitting (his previous ball) up to 7500 (rpm),” Loper said. “That’s too high… (With the TaylorMade TP5x) he didn’t express any concern with (spin being too low). It was launching high, getting to its apex and landing soft.”

Hoyt McGarity, President of True Spec Golf , an internationally renowned custom club fitter with more than a dozen locations, has seen similar performance gains with TaylorMade’s TP5x golf ball through his personal testing and his testing with Tour players. He said he’s seeing 2-3 mph more ball speed compared to other golf balls. Just as importantly, he’s seeing those gains with a higher ball flight in what he called “straight up” club tests.

“Some of the Tour players — straight up, same loft, same lie, same golf club, same everything — they would launch this golf ball almost a degree higher, which is amazing,” McGarity said. “I was seeing almost 2-3 mph more ball speed for these Tour players, not that they need more distance, but I’m like, ‘You’re launching higher and it’s going further and it’s still coming in soft; it’s not coming in low and hot. It’s coming in high and still soft, so what’s the disadvantage?’ If you’re a low-ball hitter with low spin, you might have some issues. Your half shots might be tough to control the distance on it, that’s all.”

So while TaylorMade’s TP5 and TP5x golf balls are designed to go farther and with less spin on full shots, the company says their steeper landing angles will help them stop nearly as fast as higher-spinning balls. TaylorMade’s belief is based on the company’s scientific bounce-and-roll calculations, which factor in green conditions and landing characteristics. Yes, the lower spin of its golf balls in relation to competitors leads to minimally more roll out, but the amount is insignificant according to TaylorMade: an additional 1-1.5 feet. The company also points out that with a longer-flying golf ball, golfers will be hitting shorter clubs into greens, leading to more control. An 8 iron will yield greater stopping power and accuracy than a 7 iron, right?

Expert fitter Scott Felix of Felix Clubworks agrees with TaylorMade in theory. He said that as long as the golf ball is coming into a green at a steep enough angle, low spin is not a problem for approach shots.

“Most golfers spin the ball too much with their irons, costing them distance,” Felix said, “…but for golfers who already have a flat trajectory (with their irons), lowering spin won’t help them hold the green.”

McGarity added that about 80 percent of golfers who come to him for a fitting spin the ball too much, and for Tour players, the drop in spin won’t have a detrimental effect.

“Lets say the average spin on Tour is 6,000 (rpm with a 6 iron); it’s not like [TaylorMade’s TP5x golf ball is spinning] around 4,000 (rpm),” McGarity said. “If your average land angle is 49 degrees, they’re hitting these balls at say 5800 spin, which I think is great, and with a 50-degree land angle, so what’s the harm? It’s not like it’s coming in at 44 degrees; that’d be probably a one hop over the back and get into a little trouble.”

On the other hand, Felix notes that some Tour players simply want maximum control from a golf ball due to firmer fairway and green conditions, so lowering spin isn’t always the best option for them. But for average golfers, the distance gains will be beneficial.

“Most golfers aren’t playing in Tour conditions and will simply benefit from hitting the ball farther and having shorter irons into the green,” Felix said.

McGarity also warns golfers who already play low-spinning irons and drivers, and who spin the ball below 2,000 rpm with the driver, that the TP5 and TP5x golf balls may not be for them.

“This ball is different,” McGarity said. “You can make the argument this is too hot a golf ball for people who don’t spin it (enough). But that’s not that large percentage of golfers.”

After announcing an equipment contract with TaylorMade at The Players Championship, Rory McIlroy called TaylorMade’s TP5x golf ball the most important factor in his decision to sign with the company. With the new ball, he said he not only picked up distance, but consistency and control in the wind.

“I wasn’t really happy with the golf ball I was playing, and I needed to do something,” McIlroy said. “I felt like I struggled in the wind. So I sort of went back to the drawing board and tested for about 10 days pretty extensively after Augusta … I worked with the TaylorMade guys one day and started just on Trackman on the range and saw stuff with the golf ball … I thought, ‘Wow, this is what I need.’ This is exactly the thing that I’ve been struggling with.”

McGarity’s experiences confirmed McIlroy’s sentiments.

“I picked up a half club and I sit around and hit balls all the time on Trackman, so for me to pick up a half a club, it’s not the club it has to be the ball,” McGarity said. “And into the wind I can definitely see it’s more penetrating. I’m not a super high-spin player, so some shots I’ll hit the ball farther than I expected, but I’d rather have that issue than (to hit it) short.”

So there’s agreement that the ball spins less, goes farther and performs better in the wind with irons. But when fitting a golf ball, is iron play even the best place to start? Golf is about more than just iron shots, after all.

For Felix, a ball fitting begins by having a client hit “a bunch” of different golf balls on the putting green to narrow it down to a few based on feel preferences. Then he has the golfer take those golf balls to the chipping green and bunker. He then works back to 40-yard shots, narrowing down the options throughout the process based on feel and performance. After that, golfers will progress to the driver, and then to the irons.

“Usually you want to get a few balls you really like on and around the greens, then work backwards from there,” Felix said.

Initial testing for McIlroy started on the golf course, and not on Trackman, according to TaylorMade representatives. Once he became comfortable with performance and feel, he then took to Trackman to get dialed in with spin and match the golf ball to his equipment.

TaylorMade’s TP5x and TP5 golf ball (right), which has a slightly firmer feel.

Despite the low-spinning qualities of the golf balls on full shots, TaylorMade believes it’s giving up nothing to the competition in terms of short game performance. “There’s no golf ball that spins more around the greens,” a TaylorMade representative told me. That’s a legal way of saying no other golf ball company can prove, with confidence, that its golf ball spins more around the greens.

By producing extremely low spin on full shots, but without giving up performance and feel around the greens, TaylorMade says it’s providing the best qualities from each end of the spectrum with its TP5 and TP5x golf balls. But… how? TaylorMade engineers accomplished the feat by using larger and softer-compression cores. TaylorMade says the cores “activate” at 70 mph of swing speed inside of the five-piece constructions, which also have firm mantle layers and soft, urethane covers. The result is low spin on full shots, and high spin on shorter shots.

“It’s the real first golf ball (TaylorMade has) made that’s a game changer,” McGarity said.

TaylorMade does admit, however, that golfers may be sacrificing a bit of “workability” with the irons. That’s to say hitting hooks and slices with its golf balls becomes more difficult due to the lower spin. While the TP5 will offer a bit more of that control than the TP5x, it’s definitely something to keep in mind for those who prefer to play a Bubba Watson-style of golf.

Looking to the future

So does all of this mean that lower-spinning golf balls on full shots are the future of golf? Will we see golf equipment companies striving for drastically lower spin over the next few years?

TaylorMade representatives say they continue to chase lower spin in their prototyping, and until the golf ball is diving out of the air to the golfer’s detriment, lower spin is the future of golf balls. Obviously, TaylorMade is fully committed to a lower-spinning golf ball, and lower spin in general throughout its product lines.

For other premium golf ball manufacturers, bringing lower-spinning options to the market seems likely, given the performance benefits and Tour validation of TaylorMade’s new golf balls. But there’s a reason there are so many variations of golf balls on the market; every golfer is different. Some need more spin with the driver and want more workability with the irons, some want a super firm feel and others just want the cheapest ball possible.

Golfers should view TaylorMade’s TP5 and TP5x golf balls as options in the vast marketplace of golf balls, and perform thorough testing to figure out if this is the right line of golf balls for their game. And remember, lower spin and more distance will require recalibrating your iron distances, and possibly adjusting your equipment, so a mid-season switch is recommended only to those who are willing to put in the necessary work.

Review: Callaway Chrome Soft X Golf Balls

Pros: Incredibly soft feel like the Chrome Soft, but the Chrome Soft X increases spin through the bag to give better players more control.

Cons: Golfers who struggle with too much slice or hook won’t find it any easier to keep shots close to the target with the Chrome Soft X.

Who They’re For: Better players with higher swing speeds looking for a soft-feeling ball that checks up faster with iron shots than Chrome Soft.

Callaway says the Chrome Soft is “the ball that changed the ball,” and in many ways that’s true. It’s a tour-level golf ball with a softer feel, less spin through the bag and even a lower price point ($39.99) than some other tour balls in its category.

The Chrome Soft is Callaway’s best ball option for the vast majority of golfers ( and received a 5-star rating by GolfWRX ), but it isn’t for everyone. Callaway’s solution for them is its new Chrome Soft X golf ball.

What’s New in the Chrome Soft X

The original Chrome Soft golf ball, launched in 2015 had the very soft compression of 65. When Callaway released the 2016 version of Chrome Soft, it gave the ball a slightly higher compression (75), which improved its consistency on short-iron shots. The compression of its new Chrome Soft X is 90.

The reason for the higher compression has to do with the low-spin profile of the Chrome Soft, a blessing to most golfers as it helps their shots fly straighter and farther. It’s not ideal for some tour pros and better golfers, however. We’re talking about the kind of golfers who have great mechanics and strike shots consistently on the center of the club face. They often have a ball flight that is so dialed in that the lower-spinning performance of the Chrome Soft makes their shots harder to control. To address that small but important segment of the golfing population, Callaway created the higher-spinning Chrome Soft X.

Under the hood, Callaway used a slightly thinner urethane cover, increased the size and hardened the compression of the Dual SoftFast core, and enhanced the HEX Aerodynamics. As a result, the Chrome Soft X should generate more ball speed and spin through the entire bag.

Dave Bartels, Callaway’s Senior Director of Golf Ball R&D, says golfers will be able will notice the differences and have a clear favorite. “We expect that golfers who like the Chrome Soft X probably won’t like the Chrome Soft very much, and vice versa.”

Performance

Since the Chrome Soft X is meant to be a complimentary golf ball to the Chrome Soft, we tested them head-to-head.

Compared to the Chrome Soft the Chrome Soft X should:

Feel almost as soft as the Chrome Soft with the same durability.
Generate more spin where better golfers need it.
Generate faster ball speeds.

Like previous reviews, I tested these on the course and on a launch monitor with a 60-degree wedge, 6-iron and a driver. To allow me to re-hit each ball numerous times, I completed the testing indoors on a camera-based SkyTrak launch monitor. To keep the numbers as consistent as possible between the balls, I threw out and re-hit any shots that were not struck on the center and did not land within a designated target zone for each club (Wedge: +/- 3yards, 6 Iron: +/- 8 yards, Driver: Target width of 40 yards).

But I’m not a robot, so take that into account.

60-degree full wedge shots

What the data actually shows: Pretty much as expected. Overall, the Chrome Soft X clocked 1 mph more ball speed, 136 rpm more spin and carried 2 yards farther. These are very subtle differences, and for an amateur like me I would not expect to notice a difference on the course.

The larger Dual SoftFast core and higher compression could account for the additional ball speed and carry distance. For me, 2 yards won’t require much of an adjustment. If you are a better player completely dialed in with your distances, you might need to make a minor adjustment.

What I saw on the course: When I’m testing golf balls, I like to drop one down without looking at the label and hit a shot. This allows me to remain unbiased in my expectation and just watch what the ball does. When I did this test with the Chrome Soft X on a full wedge shot, I was instantly impressed. The feel was incredible and the distance was spot on. After the wedge testing, I would’ve put this ball straight in the bag.

6-iron shots

What the data actually shows: The Chrome Soft X is continuing to spin more through the bag. Ball speeds were slightly higher by about 0.8 mph. The Chrome Soft X generated a considerable amount of additional spin, but also flew slightly higher and had a steeper descent angle.

Just like you’ll see with the driver below, the additional spin decreased my distance (the Chrome Soft X averaged 3 yards less carry and 4 yards less total distance), but increased my stopping power.

What I saw on the course: Just like previous Chrome Soft balls, the feel off the club face with mid irons was very soft. I really noticed the additional spin on the course, as my draw shot shape started to get a little more curve to it and my shots stopped faster on the greens. I felt like I was able to attack greens with longer irons, flying shots all the way to the hole instead of playing a little short and letting the ball release more.

Driver shots

Main differences we expect to see: The Chrome Soft X should spin more slightly more and deliver higher ball speeds than the Chrome Soft.

What the data actually shows: I am not a high swing-speed player. My average playing swing speed is around 105 mph, which is generally considered the cut-off before you have a “high swing speed.” Also, I am not a low-spin player, so having a ball that can spin a little more might not be the best for my specific game. Based solely on that, I would not expect to see the full benefits of the Chrome Soft X

The testing backs this up. The Chrome Soft X delivered the same ball speed, but with 432 rpm more spin. Bartels says Callaway’s testing has shown golfers either spinning the Chrome Soft and Chrome Soft X the same off the tee, or an increase of 100-200 rpm with the Chrome Soft X. He called 400 rpm “within the ballpark,” but not typical.

Just to be clear, we’re talking about a change in performance that resulted in just 1 yard less carry distance and 3 yards less total distance; basically nothing.

What I saw on the course: As my launch monitor data showed, the Chrome Soft X appeared to fly higher and not roll as much when it hit the ground.

The one place I saw a benefit to the Chrome Soft X was when I contacted a drive high off the club face. With the Chrome Soft, these drives fell out of the sky more quickly, costing me carry distance. With the Chrome Soft X, they stayed in the air a little longer. It’s clear for low-spin players, or those with already optimal launch conditions, the Chrome Soft X can provide as good, if not better performance.

Around the Green

I put the Chrome Soft X through the paces of low spinners, high flop shots, bump and runs, and bunker shots. As expected, it performed identically to the Chrome Soft.

Feel is subjective, but I found the Chrome Soft X to be one of the softest tour balls on the market today.

I completed all my testing with only one ball, so it saw a considerable amount of shots. Like previous Chrome Soft balls, the Chrome Soft X is very durable. It took a beating with the 60-degree and showed only light scuff marks. Both the Chrome Soft X and the Chrome Soft perform very similarly in terms of durability.

The Takeaway

The Chrome Soft X isn’t for everyone and that is why Callaway is marketing the “X” as a complimentary ball to the Chrome Soft and not a replacement.

With the changes Callaway has made, the Chrome Soft X checks off all the criteria for a high-performance premium golf ball. If you thought the 2016 Chrome Soft was a little too soft with too little spin through the bag, the Callaway Chrome Soft X might just be the ball you’re looking for.

Review: Callaway Chrome Soft golf balls

Pros: The Chrome Soft has an incredibly soft feel, but doesn’t skimp on performance. It will create maximum distance off the tee for 99 percent of golfers, yet offers short-game spin that rivals more expensive models.

Cons: Golfers with high swing speeds (105+ mph) — a.k.a. the 1 percent — may lose a few yards off the tee due to the Chrome Soft’s low-compression design.

Who They’re For: Any golfer can play the Chrome Soft.

Last year, Callaway released the Speed Regime golf ball line , which offered three different golf balls designed for different swing speeds, all with slightly different levels of compression and design. While this gave golfers the ability to really “fit” a golf ball to their game, more choices doesn’t always translate into better decision-making.

With its new Chrome Soft golf balls, Callaway has released just one ball, with one set of specifications, designed to provide a benefit to all golfers regardless of their swing speed.

The three-piece Chrome Soft, with a low-compression Soft Fast core and extremely soft DuraSpin cover, generates lower spin off the driver and long irons for more distance, while generating tour-level spin with shorter irons and shots around the green.

Let’s Talk Core

Thanks to a brand new SoftFast core, as Callaway calls it, the ball has a compression rating of 65. By comparison, last year’s Callaway SR-3 had a compression of around 105. Typically, the softer the core, the more the ball deforms at impact. This is great for slower swing speed players who need the ball to deform more so it can spring back into shape and generate more distance. But faster swing speed players can actually lose distance if the ball is too soft. After experimenting with 39 different prototypes, however, Callaway was able to create the right combination of the core and mantle layer so the Chrome Soft retains the energy from impact and keeps ball speed high — even at faster swing speeds.

The Chrome Soft is available now in White , Soft Yellow and Truvis Technology with an MSRP of $37.99. Custom player numbers and personalization is also available.

We put the new Chrome Soft to the test against the Callaway Speed Regime SR-3, which I tested last year .

Compared to the Speed Regime line the Chrome Soft should:

Feel softer off every club, with slightly better durability.
Generate less spin off the driver.
Create more spin off shorter irons.

Like all reviews, I tested these on the range, on the course, and on a launch monitor with a 60-degree wedge, 6-iron and a driver. I headed to BridgeMill Golf Academy and worked with head pro Tom Losinger to get the data using a Trackman in his indoor studio.

What the data actually shows: Exactly what we expected to see. The Chrome Soft generated 200 rpm more spin than the SR-3, while launching lower and hitting a slightly lower peak height. I did, however, see a big difference in ball speed and carry distance, with the Chrome Soft flying three more yards on average.

Increased ball speed or carry distance with the shorter irons is not typically on the list of requests from better players. In this case, it’s a by-product of the new SoftFast core and three more yards of carry with a 60-degree wedge is fairly significant. That 10-foot putt for birdie is now almost 20. These types of gains will require an adjustment.

What I saw on the course: This ball was perfect inside 100 yards. If it was flying farther than other balls I’ve played, I didn’t notice. The trajectory on full wedge shots was nice and low compared to other balls, and I was already able to notice a difference in feel between the Chrome Soft and the SR-3. A difference of 200 rpm of spin wasn’t noticeable on the course, as both balls performed very similarly when they hit the green.

What the data actually shows: The data backed up the expectations when it came to ball speed. However, I actually saw more spin on my 6-iron compared to the SR-3 and even other tour balls. This could be due to a variety of factors concerning my individual swing, and other golfers might see less spin off their mid irons. Compared to the SR-3, the Chrome Soft launched a little higher, with more spin and ball speed, allowing it to carry a little more than one yard farther. It also hit a higher peak height with a steeper descent angle.

What I saw on the course: I was probably most impressed with the Chrome Soft with the mid to long irons. Yes, the ball performed great off the driver, but the softer feel was very apparent with an iron in my hands. Launching shots with mid to long irons had a more effortless feel. I was also able to get some nice height and spin on my longer irons without sacrificing distance, so I could land shots on the green and see them stick, instead of hitting and running off the back.

Main differences we expect to see: The Chrome Soft should spin less, but still generate more ball speed than the SR-3.

What the data actually shows: I’m a borderline high-speed guy with the driver. My average swing speed is around 106 mph — right on the borderline where golfers can start to “over-compress” the Chrome and possibly lose distance.

You may have read editor Zak Kozuchowski’s reviews on GolfWRX, who can generate more than 115 mph of swing speed with his driver. In his on-course testing , he said he hit the Chrome Soft about the same distance as other tour balls.

“If they liked everything else about the ball, I can’t imagine a golfer who swings 105+ mph wouldn’t play the Chrome Soft just because it was a few yards shorter than a higher-compression tour ball off the tee,” he said. “If a soft feel is important to them, that’s going to take precedence over a few yards of extra distance. And they’ll get those few yards back with their long irons, anyways.”

In my testing, the Chrome Soft generated slightly faster ball speeds, and a lot less spin — almost 300 rpm less spin than the SR-3. This translated into an extra 1.5 yards of carry, and more than 5 extra yards of total distance.

What I saw on the course: The distance gains and lower spin appeared to translate to the course. I wasn’t having any issues getting the ball to run out once it hit the fairway. And the distance appeared to be spot on, if not slightly longer.

Around the green

It is always fun to have that moment in a round where you hit the low, checking chip that freaks out your playing partners. I had that moment from about 55 yards away to a back pin, with out of bounds directly behind the green. With a 56-degree wedge, I hit the low shot and right before the ball hit the green, my playing partners were yelling “get down!” But I knew I hit it well and the ball bounced, checked, and then just lipped the cup.

Could I have executed that shot with other tour balls? Yes. But, it is important to know I can execute it with the Chrome Soft. I’m not a short-game wizard like one of Callaway’s more well-known tour pros, but these balls allow me to hit any kind of shot around the green without hesitation.

The Chrome Soft feels much softer than the SR-3, which was noticeably softer than previous generation Callaway tour balls. The sound profile has a lower, less “clicky” sound that translates into improved feel. The engineers really have brought the incredible feel of the SuperSoft to the tour-level Chrome Soft.

I’ve rolled some beautifully smooth putts with these balls. They are predictable and roll true when you strike them well. While I won’t go so far as to say they are the best feeling golf ball on the market (although they are close), they are the best feeling Callaway golf ball I’ve tested.

When most people hear “softer cover,” they instantly assume it will be less durable — and for good reason. It is counter intuitive to believe that soft equals durable. I’m not going to pretend to know the science behind it, but the DuraSpin cover is made from Thermoplastic Urethane, which actually becomes more durable the softer it gets.

I’ve played numerous rounds with the same ball, and also completed all the testing with only three Chrome Soft golf balls, so I can back up Callaway’s claims. These balls are definitely durable and can last numerous rounds if you don’t lose them. With fresh wedge grooves, I was getting all the spin benefits and little to no scuffing. I did see some minor scuffs after finding some rocky rough off the tee, but the ball was still playable and I shouldn’t have been over there in the first place!

If you’ve avoided Callaway balls in the past because of the “clicky” stigma that has followed them around, it might be time to try a sleeve of the Chrome Soft. Many golfers, myself included, really love the feel of the Callaway SuperSoft , but not the overall performance. The Chrome Soft is a marriage of the soft feel of the SuperSoft with the tour-level performance of the Callaway SR-3. With low spin off the driver and the most spin on short irons of the tour balls I’ve tested this year, the Chrome Soft is one of the best golf balls on the market today.

We gave the Chrome Soft 5 stars, but one of our editors made the case that on a scale of 1-10, the Chrome Soft is an “11.” If you’ve seen the movie Spinal Tap, you know what he means.

See what GolfWRX Members had to say about the Chrome Soft in our Official Forum Testing Thread.

[wrx_retail_links productid=”12″]

The Wedge Guy: Golf mastery begins with your wedge game

Tour pro calls Anthony Kim a ‘f*****g idiot’ following Instagram comeback post

John Daly stuns fans into silence with brutal opening tee shot on PGA Tour Champions

Things got heated at the Houston Open between Tony Finau and Alejandro Tosti. Here’s why

Anthony Kim WITB 2024 (February)

This Rory McIlroy post-round ‘The Match’ moment is going viral…but all is likely not what it seems

Scottie Scheffler WITB 2024 (March)

Photos from the 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational

Anthony Kim’s speculated LIV Golf sign-on fee may surprise you

The total sum that Sergio Garcia needs to pay in fines if he wants to return to DP World Tour revealed

Raul Pereda WITB 2024 (April)

Raul Pereda what’s in the bag accurate as of the Texas Children’s Houston Open. More photos from the event here....

Rickie Fowler WITB 2024 (April)

Rickie Fowler what’s in the bag accurate as of the Valero Texas Open. More photos from the event here. Driver: Cobra...

Callum McNeill WITB 2024 (April)

Callum McNeill what’s in the bag accurate as of the Texas Children’s Houston Open. More photos from the event here....

Jimmy Stanger WITB 2024 (April)

Jimmy Stanger what’s in the bag accurate as of the Valero Texas Open. More photos from the event here. Driver:...

2-time major champ announces shock retirement from the sport at age of 33

Charlie Woods finds it tough going on American Junior Golf Association debut

Edoardo Molinari reveals the latest PGA Tour golfer to turn down ‘good offer’ from LIV Golf

Scottie Scheffler had an interesting response when asked how he ‘quiets the noise’ following Players victory

Jon Rahm dealt fresh blow to hopes of qualifying for 2025 Ryder Cup

Addiction, spinal fusion, and scam artists – Everything Anthony Kim revealed in candid interview with David Feherty

The Sand Trap

Golf News, Reviews, and Commentary

Bridgestone 2012 Tour B330 Series Ball Review

If you play golf, then Bridgestone’s probably got a ball for you. Read our thoughts on the premium B330 line.

Share this with your golf buddies:

Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)

Bridgestone’s goal is to design a golf ball for every level of player. This is not an easy task since there are so many variations of golf swings. Getting fit for the right ball is just as important as finding the right shaft, lie angle, or grip size. Bridgestone is not only innovating golf ball technology but how golfers get fit for their ball. One thing is for certain, they aren’t afraid to compare their results against their numerous competitors.

For the past couple years, Bridgestone has had teams of ball fitting specialists provide free fitting sessions for golfers around the country. During these sessions, golfers see how the ball they currently play stacks up against a Bridgestone ball. I’m sure their competitors have taken notice. It also doesn’t hurt to have some notable staff players, Matt Kuchar, Brandt Snedeker, and Fred Couples, playing well and getting a lot of TV time. Technology There once was a time in the golf industry where the number one ball in golf was wound and constructed with a balata cover. Bridgestone was the first to develop a urethane three-piece solid-core golf ball, putting them on the map as a golf ball innovator. Urethane is an extra-soft, synthetic material that provides high-spin performance and greater durability than balata. In fact, urethane is softer than both surlyn and balata. These urethane-covered, solid core balls provided optimum spin and soft feel while providing a more consistent performance alternative to their wound balata-covered counterparts.

Bridgestone currently produces four models of the Tour B330 series. Each tailored to a specific category of golfer and their swing characteristics.

Tour B330 and Tour B330S The line of Tour B330 and B330-S are made for players that swing above 105 MPH, at the tour level. Tour average is about 112 MPH. Both Tour B330 and Tour B330-S are four-piece balls. The biggest change to these balls from last year is that the cover is now 20% thinner. By shrinking the size of the cover Bridgestone is able to impart additional spin, which is good for control around the green. The Tour B330 is 6% softer and the TourB330-S is 13% softer than 2011’s design. The softer cover layer enhances green side control because of increased spin.

Since Bridgestone is thinning out the cover they also have to make the core of the golf ball larger. This new design is called the Gradational Compression Core. Two things happen when the core is enhanced, driver backspin is reduced and initial velocity is increased to maximize ball speed. All other things being equal, a higher ball speed translates into more distance.

Dimples provide the lift needed to keep a ball airborne. Without them a golf ball’s performance would be severely restricted. New for 2012 is Bridgestone’s Dual Dimple Technology. This was introduced first in the E series ball last year. In general, golf balls with deeper dimples will tend to have a lower trajectory. Those with shallower dimples typically will generate a higher trajectory. Dual Dimple Technology creates the best of both worlds by improving the aerodynamics and performance of the ball in the wind.

Inside of each dimple pattern is an inner dimple. When a ball is struck, the highest amount of air flow is taking place. This is where the dual dimple design takes effect, the inner dimple takes that air flow, propels the ball upward and forces it to its highest point. The result is that the ball stays in the air longer. The outer dimple improves the landing trajectory. While other balls may tend to land at a steep angle, the outer dimple shallows the ball’s landing angle. With a more shallow decent the golf ball is encouraged to roll out further for great distance.

While the Tour B330 is a high performance golf ball designed to reduce driver spin, the Tour B330-S is the highest spinning green side performance ball they’ve ever produced. Players that swing over 105 MPH that are looking to maximize driver length should consider the B330 and players that need more spin or want more control into and around the greens should check out the B330-S. The new Tour B330 and Tour B330-S balls feature a street price of $44.99 per dozen.

President Cup Captains Nick Price and Fred Couples are currently using the Tour B330 line on tour.

One of Bridgestone’s most innovative and oldest designs is the Seamless Cover Technology™, which is a proprietary manufacturing process that eliminates the straight part line and creates a non-uniform part line around the golf ball. The result is the most consistent golf ball in terms of accuracy, distance, and trajectory ever created. A seam on a golf ball is a straight line or “gap” where the dimples from the top half and the dimples from the bottom half of a golf ball do not meet through the compression molding process. A golf ball struck on the seam will not produce the same result because the asymmetrical dimple pattern significantly alters the aerodynamics of the golf ball and causes a wide range of flight characteristics. If you think about the core as the engine and the dimples as the wings, then a golf ball struck on the seam is not going to get the same “lift,” which translates into inconsistent distance and accuracy.

What Bridgestone balls do have is called a part line. A part line is created where the tool that encases the core separates after the injection molding process. The resulting line of material is then shaved off. Since this part line is created by the tooling process used in injection molding and does not affect the dimple pattern of the golf ball, the part line has a minimal effect on the performance of a golf ball.

B330-RX and B330-RXS Bridgestone Golf tested thousands of golfers and found that no ball on the market could deliver great spin and performance on the green while also offering a softer compression that allowed moderate swing speed players the ability to compress the core in the same manner a high swing speed player does. As a result, Bridgestone Golf has developed the new Tour B330-RX and Tour R330-RXS.

These balls are made specifically for low handicappers who do not have tour-level swing speeds but want tour-level performance in their short game. With its new Gradational Compression Core, the B330-RX and B330-RXS provides maximum distance for moderate swing speed players, speeds of less than 105 MPH with a driver. Other golf ball manufacturers don’t produce a golf ball for this segment of player. The norm for the industry is to have a tour level, premium urethane moderate spin and low spin option. Then the next level down is a surlyn or fusablend cover which is not as soft as Urethane but is more cost effective.

The Tour B330-RX and B330-RX-S are the same balls that Matt Kuchar and Fred Couples play except for two things. First, the core is softer which is more favorable for players with swing speeds of less than 105 MPH. The other difference is that it is a three piece ball because as you add additional layers the golf ball becomes harder to compress.

The biggest change from last year’s B330-RX series is the size of the inner mantle layer. The new inter mantle layer has been re-formulated to reduce driver spin. According to Bridgestone’s testing, 70% of golfers deal with excessive driver spin. With lower spin not only can you hit it farther but you have a chance of reducing dispersion. This results in longer and straighter shots.

The B330-RX and B330-RXS also feature the new Dual Dimple Technology for optimized aerodynamic performance. The cover’s smaller inner dimples increase thrust power at launch for greater distance while the larger outer dimples promote a shallow angle of descent for increased roll out on landing. The result of the improved performance at both takeoff and landing is greater overall distance performance and more consistency in flight. The new Tour B330-RX and Tour B330-RXS balls feature a street price of $44.99 per dozen.

Both the RX and RXS are available in Optic Yellow, which Bridgestone says improves visibility. I didn’t test any balls in yellow, as I like white and yellow reminds me of range balls. I know there are a variety of colors you can get golf balls in Asia, but fortunately (for me) that craze hasn’t yet hit the U.S.!

Get Fit Bridgestone is committed to making sure golfers get fit for the best ball for them through their Ball Fitting Challenge . Through optimizing your ball speed, launch angle, and spin rates, Bridgestone golf ball fitting specialists can guide you to a golf ball that will enhance your performance from tee to green. Bridgestone analyzes your shot data using a sophisticated computer system, the Science Eye Launch Monitor. During the fitting you will hit a series of shots with your driver, using your current golf ball. The high-speed cameras in the Science Eye Launch Monitor system will capture multiple measurements and use that data to calculate your specific launch characteristics. Based on your ball flight characteristics, the technician will either confirm that you are currently playing the best ball for you or recommend a Bridgestone ball that better suits your game. After hitting a series of shots with the recommended ball, you will be given a side-by-side comparison of all data, which includes your launch angle, spin rates, and distance with each ball.

At the PGA Show this year I was able to go through my very own Ball Fitting Challenge. I hit three drives with the ball I was currently playing, a “tour” ball. My spin was very low, 1700 RPM, an added reason for that was that I was hitting a Bridgestone J40 430 driver. This driver is known to be a spin killer. Even with my gamer driver the spin still would have been in the 2200-2300 RPM range. Then I hit three drives with the Tour B330-RXS because unfortunately my swing speed is under 105 MPH. The Bridgestone fitter also wanted me to get my spin numbers higher. The three drives I hit with the B330-RXS weren’t as solid as the first three but they ended up going the same distance. The softer cover and larger core was able to offset my lack of compression. Check out the video of my fitting above.

I applaud Bridgestone on how accessible and easy it is to find and complete a fitting. The only thing lacking is the consideration for testing players around the green. Another ball manufacturer prides itself on fitting from green to tee. It’s a longer process and one you’ll probably have to pay for. Hopefully Bridgestone will eventually expand their fitting process to include some short game shots.

Performance: Tour B330 and B330-S (Erik J. Barzeski is adding a review of the B330/B330-S.)

With a swing speed around 110, I’ve always been comfortable playing the firmer ball. I generate enough backspin and launch the ball at a reasonable angle through the bag to stop the ball on the greens, so I’ve played the firmer of a company’s two balls (i.e. the Pro V1x over the Pro V1) since urethane covered golf balls first came on the market. To be honest, some of the softer covered “high-spin” premium balls spin way too much for me, both off the tee and around the greens, though the gap has closed in recent years to the point where most golf balls are fairly similar.

So of the two B330 balls, I prefer the B330 over the brother B330-S. I found that the B330 launched with essentially the same characteristics as the other longest premium balls I tried (it traveled farther than some of the other premium balls I tested), and launched and spun at about the same rates. Ball speed was consistently high, and carry distances were good.

Trackman tells me that my landing angle shallowed perhaps three or four degrees with the driver over other balls, though peak height was consistent with other balls at about 85 feet. I don’t know if 3° is enough to worry about, but it was consistent and speaks to the dual dimple design. I was concerned – and even asked at the PGA Show where I didn’t get an incredibly satisfying answer – whether the landing angle would change with the mid-irons. These clubs typically don’t have enough spin to “stop” the ball like a wedge does, and in the single-digit to plus handicap range, you don’t want “extra distance due to roll-out” with your mid-irons because the landing angle is shallowed out. Suffice to say I was happy that the dual dimples did not seem to adversely affect the landing angle or roll-out of the golf ball off any club above my 3W or hybrid. Great!

The ball felt lively off the clubface and performed admirably across the variety of shots I’ll hit. It never ballooned with the driver, even into the stiffest of breezes, and in fact wind play is one of the ball’s strong suits. This ball bores through a cross-wind and holds its line about as well as any ball I’ve ever played. I imagine the dimples have a bit to do with that, as well.

Around the greens the ball behaves as expected. From various lies – sand or grass – I can play every combination of height and spin and the ball reacts as I would expect. I never hit a shot that I expected to grab that ran out or a shot I expected to come off low that floated high, which is nice. The ball behaved exactly as expected around the greens.

What’s nice about the B330/B330-S is that the gap between them – the added softness and spin found in the B330-S – is not nearly so large that it’s unplayable. I could easily see myself playing the B330-S in tournaments or on days when the greens get really firm, for the added spin, with little to no adjustment in expectations for height or spin.

I’m really picky about my golf ball, and the B330 and B330-S are a one-two punch that sits squarely in a very short list of three golf balls I am happy to put into play.

Performance: Tour B330-RX and B330-RXS I have never been a player to be loyal to a certain brand of golf ball. You name it and I’ve played it. Several years ago I would have categorized myself as a low launch, high spin player. I would always tend to play a ball that promoted itself to reduce spin. Now, after some major swing improvements, I tend to generate a bit less backspin than ideal and a higher launch. It’s been more of a mental adjustment to trust this fact by playing models that are softer will benefit my game.

Putting these Bridgestone balls in play has been a lot of fun. I’ve been able to test the B330-RX and the B330-RXS. I’ve ended up preferring the B330-RX because I see a difference in run out with the driver and I don’t feel I’m sacrificing control around the greens. Like I said, I have played numerous kinds of balls in the past and to be painfully honest, I haven’t been one to notice huge differences between a ProV1 or a ProV1x. With the B330-RX, it’s a different experience. As advertised, the wind affects the golf ball’s flight less than previous balls I’ve played.

The greens at my home course can get firm and a shot that gets a bad bounce can end up in the deep rough just off the putting surface. It’s been nice to notice more shots hitting and stopping, giving myself more birdie putts. Even on days where I’m missing a lot of greens and I’m hitting more pitch shots from the rough, I can be more aggressive and predict how the ball is going to land on the green. I noticed the B330-RXS was slightly softer with pitches and sand shots but for me it wasn’t as reactive off the driver as the B330-RX.

Durability Bridgestone’s technological advancements really shine when it comes to the Tour B330 durability. There is slight visible wear after hitting iron and wedge shots but there isn’t any shearing, something I’ve experienced with other name brand golf balls. I even played the same ball for two straight rounds without any problems. It’s great to know that you don’t have to replace your ball every couple of holes because you’re worried how it might affect control or how the ball will roll on the putting green.

Conclusion Choosing the right golf ball for your game can make a big difference in your performance on the golf course. Thanks to Bridgestone, that choice becomes a lot easier because there is a good chance they make a ball engineered for you. The Tour B330 and Tour B330-RX are geared towards those players who want to see some additional roll after hitting their drives. The difference is the B330 is for players that consistently swing their drivers over 105 MPH, while players that swing less than 105 MPH will be better suited for the B330-RX. Golfers that place a priority on short game control should consider the Tour B330-S and the B330-RXS. Like the RX, the RXS is designed for average swing speeds of players wanting to play a quality, tour-level ball.

If you currently play another brand of ball, I’d suggest picking up a sleeve of Tour B330 series balls and see for yourself how finding the right ball for your game can make a difference. Better yet find your nearest Ball Fitting Challenge where a Bridgestone fitting specialist will give you a sleeve of balls that will fit your needs after the fitting.

12 thoughts on “Bridgestone 2012 Tour B330 Series Ball Review”

I have a concern about measurement of swing speed. I swing my driver 105-110 but I swing my irons like 70 or 80. Does anybody really swing their irons 105 consistently? Im asking because Im wondering where I would fall. Would I be over 105 or under 105? I swing different clubs with different levels of speed.

@Jim..as far as i know your swing speed is how fast you swing your driver and woods. Those are the clubs that are able to compress the inner core of the ball, and the difference in firmness of the inner core is what separates the 330/330-s and the 330rx/rxs

I quit reading when I got to the part that said “they are the number one golf ball producer in Japan.”

According to the Titleist website: Titleist golf balls are made in the U.S.

Enuff said!

I would think, based on commercials and what I’ve read online, when they are talking about swing speed they are talking about driver speed.

Thanks for asking that question. I’ve wondered about that for a while as well. It seems that ball fitting, club fitting and shaft fitting all seem to focus on the swing speed of the driver. I know I’m not swinging my 7 iron (and certainly not my SW) anywhere near my measured 105mph driver speed . Makes me wonder if we shouldn’t have different shaft flexes throughout our entire set???

Odd that we pay so much attention to a club we only hit twelve or thirteen times a round!

I also then have to disagree that driver is the only club that compresses the ball. I swing my irons very down (compressing) and I wonder if my swing speed with irons is so slow because with shorter irons my swing speed slows down after contact. I may just be rambling but I think I have decided that balls made for higher swing speeds are for me. Thank you

Guys, it’s simple.

With a wedge you don’t care as much about compressing the core. It’s more of a glancing blow (due to the loft), and you only want to send the ball 100 yards or so anyway.

With a driver you will compress the golf ball farther into the core. Not only is the blow more square (less loft) but you can swing a driver much faster than a sand wedge (lighter club, longer shaft).

Manufacturers are talking only about driver clubhead speed when they give out numbers like 105 MPH. That doesn’t mean if you swing 108 with a driver but less than 105 with every other club you have to choose a ball for < 105. It means the ball engineers realize that you swing slower with shorter clubs, so they engineer the layers you do compress – the outer layers – with the shorter clubs to react properly to carry far enough with the right levels of spin.

Is there much difference in performance between the 2011 and 2012 version on the RX? 20012 has dual dimple and thinner outer layer — does it make a difference?

I’m currently playing the 2011 RX. What should I expect to see in the 2012 version?

Bridgestone team showed up at my club on Wednesday, and gave me the Bridgestone Challenge. I compared my usual ball the TopFlite Gamer.v2 with the Bridgestone E6. Driver = Razr Fit 9.5* head with Aldila RIP.D NV 60 gr. R shaft (low kick).

Both balls averaged 85.5 MPH clubhead speed, and had draw spin, which is how I was set up at address. – E6 marginally higher on launch angle and ball velocity w/ +13 yds. carry – Ideal sidespin = 2654; Gamer had +100 RPM backspin, E6 had -500 backspin. Gamer actually had -135 side spin compared to -165 for E6.

What does the “below ideal” backspin for the E6 mean in overall scheme of thing?

E6 billed as lower compression soft-feel distance ball. Will have to test out and see if E6 will check up some on partial wedge shots, or hit and run 30 feet past the pin. I have trouble with “distance balls” on half wedges more so than full iron approaches.

– Correction above: Ideal BACKSPIN = 2654.

I recently have been playing these Bridgestone balls. I have tried both the E6 and the 330-S. For me the 330-S spun too much and i will be trying the 330 next. But for the E6 i was not able to get a whole lot of backspin on the ball. Not to say that it ran out a lot, but it didn’t back up for me even on full wedge shots. What i found is that the ball will hit and stop or hit and release a little (probably about 2-3 paces or so forward from the initial landing point down to about my 4i). If i don’t love the feel of the 330 then i will be putting the e6 in my bag.

The longest player I’ve played a round with at my course uses the B330. A group of players who hit it about the same – but a shade shorter more often than not depending on the day – tend to use the ProV1x, Pro V1, Penta, B330, and B300S. Seems consistent with the advertizing at least wrt distance off the tee. None of the longest hitters (who I’ve played with – key point right there) were using a “distance ball”.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Notify me of follow-up comments by email.

Notify me of new posts by email.

Bridgestone Tour B330-S Hydro Core Golf Balls Review

Last Updated: 26 November 2015

At a glance

TG Rating Not yet rated
Owner Rating Not yet rated
RRP £47.99

What we say...

Bridgestone Golf’s new B-series models use water within the core to enhance distance with the driver.

A batch of prototypes had water mixed in with the other liquids that are added to a dry mixture to activate the rubber in the ball’s core. In tests, these prototypes performed best. The addition of water made the inner portion of the core softer and the outer portion firmer. A six per cent softer urethane cover enhances greenside control.

Players with swing speeds of more than 105mph can choose between the the Tour B330 or the softer Tour 330-S. For the majority of us who swing a driver at less than 105mph, the B330-RX is designed for players seeking more distance off the tee, while the B330-RXS offers more greenside spin.

Details: £47.99 per dozen.

www.bridgestonegolf.co.uk

Key Features:

NEW Hydro Core optimized for swings speeds above 105 mph
Reengineered Dual Mantle design reduces spin for longer distance
Very Soft Tour proven Urethane cover for extra greenside spin & control
330 dual dimple technology for a consistent flight

Product Information

Your reviews, bridgestone balls user reviews.

Bridgestone Tour B330-RXS ball review

Golf Monthly's test team reviews the Bridgestone Tour B330-RXS ball

bridgestone tour b330 rxs golf ball review

The feel and control I achieved with this product was fantastic. Having the choice to select a ball to match your swing speed is another great fitting opportunity, and it helped me maximise distance, especially off the tee. The B330-RXS also offered excellent control around the greens, when both pitching and putting.

The spin control and soft feel on offer here is outstanding. Impressively, this is achieved from a cover that is hard-wearing. Well-struck pitch shots have plenty of grab, and give you the confidence to be aggressive and take on flags.

You need to be aware of your swing speed to find the correct ball in Bridgestone’s range. Faster-than-average swingers (in excess of 105mph) will find more distance from the standard Tour B330-S.

Why you can trust Golf Monthly Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test .

Key Technology: Bridgestone Tour B330-RXS ball review

The new B-Series balls are designed to match swing speeds of all types of golfer. Hydro Core Technology means the core is softer in the centre and firmer in the outer region for reduced spin off the tee, resulting in added distance. The RXS is designed specifically for players with swing speeds of less than 105mph, and features a softer cover that the RX version.

Get the Golf Monthly Newsletter

Subscribe to the Golf Monthly newsletter to stay up to date with all the latest tour news, equipment news, reviews, head-to-heads and buyer’s guides from our team of experienced experts.

Tom Clarke joined Golf Monthly as a sub editor in 2009 being promoted to content editor in 2012 and then senior content editor in 2014, before becoming Sports Digital Editor for the Sport Vertical within Future in 2022. Tom currently looks after all the digital products that Golf Monthly produce including Strategy and Content Planning for the website and social media - Tom also assists the Cycling, Football, Rugby and Marine titles at Future. Tom plays off 16 and lists Augusta National (name drop), Old Head and Le Touessrok as the favourite courses he has played. Tom is an avid viewer of all golf content with a particularly in depth knowledge of the pro tour.

We have partnered with Pixels.com to provide a high quality printing service for Golf Monthly covers from our archives

By Elliott Heath Published 3 April 24

A split image of Chris DiMarco (left) and Rocco Mediate smoking a cigar (right

DiMarco had previously said in jest that he wished the Champions Tour would be bought by LIV so that they could play for "real money"

By Jonny Leighfield Published 3 April 24

Rory McIlroy and his caddie at the 2023 Masters

The four-time Major champion is reportedly planning on arriving to Augusta late on Tuesday next week and skipping the par 3 contest

Contact Future's experts
Terms and conditions
Privacy policy
Accessibility statement
Cookies policy
Advertise with us

Golf Monthly is part of Future plc, an international media group and leading digital publisher. Visit our corporate site . © Future Publishing Limited Quay House, The Ambury, Bath BA1 1UA. All rights reserved. England and Wales company registration number 2008885.

Top 100 Equipment News

Club Fitting
Personal Lesson
Ball Fitting
GOLF TIPS How To Play: Beginner Tips Golf Drills & Swing Tips Golf Swing Tips Golf Shots & Swing Setups Golf Exercises & Stretches Mental Golf Golf Magazine Online Golf Workouts: Your Health Bunker Golf Tips Golf Alignment Sticks
GROUPS Pro Golfers Signature Shots Pro Golfers Swing Sequence Better Golf Watching the Pros PGA Tour Players Signature Move Golf's Greatest Teachers Ladies Golf Tips Left Handed Golf Tips Senior Golf Tips & Lessons PGA Players On Course Golf Video Lessons
EQUIPMENT Drivers Tips Fairway Woods Tips Hybrid Tips Irons Tips Wedges Tips Putting Tips Comparison Charts Best Golf Hybrids Chart Best Golf Irons Chart Best Golf Putters Chart Best Golf Shoes Chart Best Golf Bags Chart Golf Balls Golf Ball Custom Fitting Golf Ball Reviews Golf Ball Compression Chart Golf Ball Comparision Chart Golf Ball Layers Chart Golf Ball Dimples Golf Ball Spin Chart Golf Ball Cover Chart Golf Ball Core Chart Golf Ball Price Chart Top Rated Golf Balls Reviews Golf Iron Reviews Golf Hybrid Reviews Golf Club Reviews, and Test Golf Ball Reviews Golf Glove Reviews Golf Bag Reviews Golf Push Cart Reviews Golf Putter Reviews Golf Shoe Reviews Golf GPS Reviews Golf Shaft Reviews Golf Club Sets Reviews Golf Course Reviews Golf Equipment News Golf Equipment Choices Golf Training Aids Thomas Golf Reviews
GUIDES Golf Grip Golf Club Fitting Golf Practice Golf Techniques Golf Questions Answered Golf Quiz United States Golf Courses Canada Golf Courses United Kingdom Golf Courses Golf Course Reviews Golf Course Map Unlimited Free Golf Tips & Lessons
INFO Home Golf Terms Golf Shop Golf in the USA Golf Videos Golf Rules Golf Tours List Golf Jokes Golf News All For Golf History of Golf Handicap Calculator Key Principles of Golf
SEARCH ARTICLES
SHOT TYPE Driving Woods Hybrids Irons Bunkers Chipping Putting
GAME IMPROVEMENT Shot Setup The Golf Swing Practice & Drills Playing Conditions Mental Game Alignment Sticks Questions Answered
GROUPS Greatest Teachers Pro Golfers Beginners Seniors Ladies Left Handed
INFO Golf in the USA Personalized Lesson Ball Fitting Club Fitting
SEARCH VIDEOS

Bridgestone Tour B330 Golf Ball Compression

The Bridgestone Tour B330 golf ball is designed for golfers who prioritize distance, control, and overall performance. While the exact compression rating for the Tour B330 is not publicly disclosed by Bridgestone, it is generally considered to have a compression in the mid-to-high range.

The Tour B330 features a multi-layer construction that includes a soft inner core, an outer mantle layer, and a urethane cover. This combination of layers is designed to provide exceptional distance off the tee while maintaining excellent control and feel around the greens. The soft inner core helps to generate high initial ball speed and reduce spin off the driver for maximum distance.

The outer mantle layer of the Tour B330 works in conjunction with the core to enhance ball speed and reduce spin on long shots. This promotes a more penetrating ball flight and increased carry distance. The urethane cover offers excellent greenside spin and control, allowing golfers to stop the ball quickly on the green and have better command over their shots.

Compression is just one factor to consider when choosing a golf ball. Other factors such as spin, feel, durability, and personal preference also play important roles. Each golfer has unique swing characteristics and preferences, so it's recommended to try out different golf balls to determine which one suits your game best.

For the most accurate and up-to-date information on the Bridgestone Tour B330 golf ball, I recommend referring to Bridgestone's official website or contacting Bridgestone directly. They can provide specific details about the ball's construction, performance characteristics, and any updates or advancements they have made to the product.

Golf Ball Compression Chart and Rank

– Compression Video

– Spin Video

– Dimples Video

– Golf Ball Brands Video

– Titleist Video

– Understanding Spin Video

Golf – How to Aim Straight off the Tee Box Video - by Rick Shiels

Share This Page

Your information has been received.

(We respect privacy and keep all emails confidential)

You have reached the maximum number of submissions for today.

Equipment Spotlight: Premium brand Thomas Golf - Custom golf clubs with Shot Accuracy Technology

New Golf Lessons Delivered Each Week

Please enter a valid email address.

New Product: Hybrid Mini Driver

AT705 Driver 10.5° Right Hand

AT705 Driver 10.5° Left Hand

AT725 Driver 10.5° Right Hand

Pete Styles PGA Pro Instructor

I Will Improve Your Game!

10,000+ videos by PGA Pros

Improve Your Game Fast!

Hybrid Golf Clubs

#1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,PW,GW,SW,LW Right Handed / Left Handed

Only $129 each Includes Free Pro-Fitting Service

AT705 Hybrid Mens

AT705 Hybrid Ladies

AT725 Hybrid Mens

AT725 Hybrid Ladies

My Account | Sitemap | Support This Site | Suggest A Tip

Moscow Metro Tour

Page active

Description

Moscow metro private tours.

2-hour tour $87: 10 Must-See Moscow Metro stations with hotel pick-up and drop-off
3-hour tour $137: 20 Must-See Moscow Metro stations with Russian lunch in beautifully-decorated Metro Diner + hotel pick-up and drop off.
Metro pass is included in the price of both tours.

Highlight of Metro Tour

Visit 10 must-see stations of Moscow metro on 2-hr tour and 20 Metro stations on 3-hr tour, including grand Komsomolskaya station with its distinctive Baroque décor, aristocratic Mayakovskaya station with Soviet mosaics, legendary Revolution Square station with 72 bronze sculptures and more!
Explore Museum of Moscow Metro and learn a ton of technical and historical facts;
Listen to the secrets about the Metro-2, a secret line supposedly used by the government and KGB;
Experience a selection of most striking features of Moscow Metro hidden from most tourists and even locals;
Discover the underground treasure of Russian Soviet past – from mosaics to bronzes, paintings, marble arches, stained glass and even paleontological elements;
Learn fun stories and myths about Coffee Ring, Zodiac signs of Moscow Metro and more;
Admire Soviet-era architecture of pre- and post- World War II perious;
Enjoy panoramic views of Sparrow Hills from Luzhniki Metro Bridge – MetroMost, the only station of Moscow Metro located over water and the highest station above ground level;
If lucky, catch a unique «Aquarelle Train» – a wheeled picture gallery, brightly painted with images of peony, chrysanthemums, daisies, sunflowers and each car unit is unique;
Become an expert at navigating the legendary Moscow Metro system;
Have fun time with a very friendly local;
+ Atmospheric Metro lunch in Moscow’s the only Metro Diner (included in a 3-hr tour)

Hotel Pick-up

Metro stations:.

Komsomolskaya

Novoslobodskaya

Prospekt Mira

Belorusskaya

Mayakovskaya

Novokuznetskaya

Revolution Square

Sparrow Hills

+ for 3-hour tour

Victory Park

Slavic Boulevard

Vystavochnaya

Dostoevskaya

Elektrozavodskaya

Partizanskaya

Museum of Moscow Metro

Drop-off at your hotel, Novodevichy Convent, Sparrow Hills or any place you wish
+ Russian lunch in Metro Diner with artistic metro-style interior for 3-hour tour

Fun facts from our Moscow Metro Tours:

From the very first days of its existence, the Moscow Metro was the object of civil defense, used as a bomb shelter, and designed as a defense for a possible attack on the Soviet Union.

At a depth of 50 to 120 meters lies the second, the coded system of Metro-2 of Moscow subway, which is equipped with everything you need, from food storage to the nuclear button.

According to some sources, the total length of Metro-2 reaches over 150 kilometers.

The Museum was opened on Sportivnaya metro station on November 6, 1967. It features the most interesting models of trains and stations.

Coffee Ring

The first scheme of Moscow Metro looked like a bunch of separate lines. Listen to a myth about Joseph Stalin and the main brown line of Moscow Metro.

Zodiac Metro

According to some astrologers, each of the 12 stops of the Moscow Ring Line corresponds to a particular sign of the zodiac and divides the city into astrological sector.

Astrologers believe that being in a particular zadiac sector of Moscow for a long time, you attract certain energy and events into your life.

Paleontological finds

Red marble walls of some of the Metro stations hide in themselves petrified inhabitants of ancient seas. Try and find some!

Every day each car in Moscow metro passes more than 600 km, which is the distance from Moscow to St. Petersburg.
Moscow subway system is the 5th in the intensity of use (after the subways of Beijing, Tokyo, Seoul and Shanghai).
The interval in the movement of trains in rush hour is 90 seconds .

What you get:

+ A friend in Moscow.
+ Private & customized Moscow tour.
+ An exciting pastime, not just boring history lessons.
+ An authentic experience of local life.
+ Flexibility during the walking tour: changes can be made at any time to suit individual preferences.
+ Amazing deals for breakfast, lunch, and dinner in the very best cafes & restaurants. Discounts on weekdays (Mon-Fri).
+ A photo session amongst spectacular Moscow scenery that can be treasured for a lifetime.
+ Good value for souvenirs, taxis, and hotels.
+ Expert advice on what to do, where to go, and how to make the most of your time in Moscow.

Write your review

Current time by city

For example, New York

Current time by country

For example, Japan

Time difference

For example, London

For example, Dubai

Coordinates

For example, Hong Kong

For example, Delhi

For example, Sydney

Geographic coordinates of Elektrostal, Moscow Oblast, Russia

City coordinates

Coordinates of Elektrostal in decimal degrees

Coordinates of elektrostal in degrees and decimal minutes, utm coordinates of elektrostal, geographic coordinate systems.

WGS 84 coordinate reference system is the latest revision of the World Geodetic System, which is used in mapping and navigation, including GPS satellite navigation system (the Global Positioning System).

Geographic coordinates (latitude and longitude) define a position on the Earth’s surface. Coordinates are angular units. The canonical form of latitude and longitude representation uses degrees (°), minutes (′), and seconds (″). GPS systems widely use coordinates in degrees and decimal minutes, or in decimal degrees.

Latitude varies from −90° to 90°. The latitude of the Equator is 0°; the latitude of the South Pole is −90°; the latitude of the North Pole is 90°. Positive latitude values correspond to the geographic locations north of the Equator (abbrev. N). Negative latitude values correspond to the geographic locations south of the Equator (abbrev. S).

Longitude is counted from the prime meridian ( IERS Reference Meridian for WGS 84) and varies from −180° to 180°. Positive longitude values correspond to the geographic locations east of the prime meridian (abbrev. E). Negative longitude values correspond to the geographic locations west of the prime meridian (abbrev. W).

UTM or Universal Transverse Mercator coordinate system divides the Earth’s surface into 60 longitudinal zones. The coordinates of a location within each zone are defined as a planar coordinate pair related to the intersection of the equator and the zone’s central meridian, and measured in meters.

Elevation above sea level is a measure of a geographic location’s height. We are using the global digital elevation model GTOPO30 .

Elektrostal , Moscow Oblast, Russia

Fairway Woods
Golf Wedges
Golf Technology
Golf Gloves
Golf Apparel
Golf Accessories
We Tried It
Head-to-Head
True Golf Fit
Our Toolkit

Ball Lab: 2022 Bridgestone TOUR B RXS Review

BY Tony Covey
Nov 16th 2022
Read all comments

Support our Mission. We independently test each product we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

MyGolfSpy Ball Lab is where we quantify the quality and consistency of the golf balls on the market to help you find the best ball for your money. Today, we’re taking a look at the 2022 Bridgestone TOUR B RXS . To learn more about our test process, how we define “bad” balls, check out our About MyGolfSpy Ball Lab page .

About the Bridgestone TOUR B RXS

Like the Srixon Q-Star Tour we covered in our previous Ball Lab, the TOUR B RXS falls within what we call the “non-Tour urethane” category. It’s a ball marketed for slower swing speed golfers who often prefer a softer-feeling ball and who won’t pay much, if any, low-compression penalty off the tee. As with other low-compression offerings, you can expect relatively high flight with low spin.

Bridgestone TOUR B RXS Construction

The Bridgestone TOUR B RXS is a three-piece ball with a 338-dimple cover.

Our samples of the TOUR B RXS were manufactured at the Bridgestone’s ball factory in Covington, Ga.

Compression

On our gauge, the Bridgestone TOUR B RXS has an average compression of 65. We classify that as a “medium firmness” offering. The TOUR B RXS isn’t nearly as soft as the softest two-piece offerings (Callaway SuperSoft, Wilson DUO, etc.). That said, it is the softest urethane-covered ball we’ve tested to date, significantly softer than a Pro V1, for example.

Diameter and Weight

Bridgestone TOUR B RXS golf balls on various diameter gauges

Category for category, Bridgestone balls tend to run a bit larger than the market average. We weren’t shocked to find that the TOUR B RXS qualifies as large relative to our database average. With that, none of the balls in the sample was under the USGA minimum size.

Also worth a mention, all of the sample met our standard for roundness.

While the Bridgestone TOUR B RXS is a bit heavier than our database average (and that can provide a small distance benefit) none of the balls we tested exceeded the USGA’s weight limit.

Centeredness and Concentricity

Across the sample, we flagged only a single ball as bad for a concentricity issues. Specifically, the cover was appreciably thicker on one side of the ball than the other. Beyond that, we found nothing of any particular concern.

Core Consistency

the core of a bridgestone TOUR B RXS golf ball (2022 version)

Core consistency and color were largely consistent throughout the sample which is typical for Bridgestone.

No notable cover issues were found.

Bridgestone TOUR B RXS – Consistency

In this section, we detail the consistency of the 2022 Bridgestone TOUR B RXS. Our consistency metrics provide a measure of how similar the balls in our sample were to one another relative to all of the models we’ve tested to date.

A chart showing the consistency of the 2022 Bridgestone TOUR B RXS golf ball

Weight Consistency

Weight consistency for the Bridgestone TOUR B RXS.
Weight was reasonably consistent from box to box with the lightest balls being found in Box 1.

Diameter Consistency

Diameter consistency for the 2022 Bridgestone TOUR B RXS falls within the Average range.
The size of the balls runs large relative to our database average.

Compression Consistency

Compression consistency falls within the Average range.
Box 1 had the greatest variation with one ball being flagged as bad for being significantly softer than the sample average.
That’s largely the result of the bad ball in Box 1.

True Price is how we quantify the quality of a golf ball. It's a projection of what you'd have to spend to ensure you get 12 good balls.

The True Price will always be equal to or greater than the retail price. The greater the difference between the retail price and the True Price, the more you should be concerned about the quality of the ball .

To learn more about our test process, how we define “bad” balls and our True Price metric, check out our About MyGolfSpy Ball Lab page .

The 2022 Bridgestone TOUR RXS is a solid offering especially for those looking for the softest urethane ball they can find.

Solidly average across the board
Two bad balls in the sample

At the time of review, the 2022 Bridgestone TOUR B RXS receives a Ball Lab score of 75. That’s a couple of ticks better than the database average (73) at the time of testing.

Support Unbiased Testing.

DID YOU KNOW: If only 1% of MyGolfSpy readers donated $25, we would be able to become completely independent in 12-months. With every donation, you create change.

Would you be willing to help by giving a donation? Every dollar will help. Make a donation to support our independent and expert golf equipment research. A PayPal account is not required in order to donate.

Donate to MGS

Apr 1, 2024

Masters gives talor gooch special invitation.

TaylorMade BRNR Mini Driver 2.0 golf club

Spotted: TaylorMade BRNR Mini Driver (2.0)

Did TRUE Linkswear Make the Perfect Walking Shoe?

about the author
latest posts

Tony is the Editor of MyGolfSpy where his job is to bring fresh and innovative content to the site. In addition to his editorial responsibilities, he was instrumental in developing MyGolfSpy's data-driven testing methodologies and continues to sift through our data to find the insights that can help improve your game. Tony believes that golfers deserve to know what's real and what's not, and that means MyGolfSpy's equipment coverage must extend beyond the so-called facts as dictated by the same companies that created them. Most of all Tony believes in performance over hype and #PowerToThePlayer.

Email Address

11 months ago

You guys really need to reformat a ton of areas of this website……having all these ads pop up in the middle of scrolling is really annoying. It makes me want to NOT read any further. a little reformatting will go a long way…..that being sid, im shocked at the 6% bad ball #. I thought Bridgestone QA was one of the best in the business.

Phil Wi[[iams

This is a ball quality of materials and construction test. Ball performance is a whole different metric. Please remember the test is used to find the quality of the ball not the performance.

Yeah, Tiger Woods only uses crappy balls. So this tester, material or mechanical engineer?

Doug Hsnsen

Thanks for reinforcing my choice of ball for the last two seasons…… came of off the higher compression Callaway Chromesoft to this ball in 2021… I did notice that this B-RXS did not spin as readily on < 80 yard pitches and chips around the green.

I returned the Tru-Vis CCS during a shipping hiatus from Bridgestone (Covid ca-ca).

This year's offering seems to have solved that difference…. and the bottom line for short/straight hitting me….. "the softest urethane covered ball on the market"!

Joila!!! Fait accompli!!

Mike in Pittsburgh

I realize having people suggest other things you could do in your tests has to be tedious, but here goes… My experience with Bridgestone balls is they absolutely positively would not stop on the greens. I realize the softness of the cover may imply this, but it would be really good to know if they will stop when chipped onto a green. To me, that is the single largest omission I find in all of your ball tests.

Mike, I have been playing the BRX for years and have no problem stopping the ball on the green. The stopping distance varies depending which brand of irons I am using. The Mizuno seems to stop the ball the best. You might want to check your grooves for a tuneup.

I appreciate the response, but I routinely get Titleist, Maxfli TourX, and even Kirkland balls to stop dead. Only the Bridgestones seem to insist on rolling out like the old Top Flite Top Rocks. Perhaps this has changed, as I refused to play Bridgestones for several years because of this. Like I said in my comment, for me any useful ball review should include this information – and if Bridgestone has cracked the problem, great, I might try them again! Until then I will avoid them.

I bought a couple of dozens of these thinking these would be the balls for me. I absolutely hated them! They were like putting super balls. I couldn’t really feel them off the club face and just didn’t get along with them at all. I ended up returning the unused dozen and gave away the sleeves that I had left. Frankly, I’d rather play a Noodle and that’s saying something for me.

I’ve had good success with the RX version of this ball. Any comments on how the RXS might play differently. If the answer is a matter of giving me some more spin, OK, I can figure that out. But I figured you MGS folks might have some more insights. I realize it’s not the ball you guys play but there’s a ton of folks out there w/ swing speeds <95 MPH. So any thoughts on that subject would be appreciated.

While these results are interesting they would be so much more helpful if tied to some simple performance tests. For example, hit the ball on an Iron Mike at three swing speeds, 85, 95, 105 and report the results. Without some tie to ball performance these tests are interesting but not really helpful, other than avoiding balls with significant problems..

You can find robot test results here ( http://mygolfspy.com/best-golf-balls-2021/ ). The thing to keep in mind is that if a ball is not consistent (Ball Lab) then the performance results are almost meaningless.

FWIW – avoiding balls with significant problems is half the battle.

Do you have a link re: “You can find robot test results here.” I’m not finding those results. Please & thank you.

Art Williams

It’s hard for me to believe this is an unbiased review. Too many top pros play the Bridgestone balls for them to be scored in the 70s. Being a senior player I do prefer the RX and RXS balls over Titleist offerings though I give the AVX cusps over the ProVs for my game. I’ll say this Bridgestone has the best Chemical Emgineers in the business by far so get some unbiased test or next time.

As clearly stated in the article, the current database average is +/- 75. That is to say, we would expect a ball of average quality to score +/- 75.

As it happens in statistics, a majority of things in a sample (in this case our golf ball database) will fall somewhere within the average range.

Remembering how things were in grade school… We got As, Bs, Cs, Ds, and Fs (hopefully not many). If you’re not grading on a curve (and we don’t), a C-level score (a 75 for example) falls right in the middle of the range (kinda like an average).

So, to reiterate, 75 is average (and there’s absolutely nothing wrong with average – and we expect most balls we test will fall within the average range).

For reference, we currently have scores between 40 and 97 in our database. 75 (again, average) isn’t as bad as you seem to think.

totally agree OP, seems the only good ball on this website are Titleist. Tiger Woods wouldnt go near this ball. Are any of the Mygolf crew engineers

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail

Sign me up for the newsletter

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed .

Titleist ProV1 Golf Balls

USA office +1 (323) 644-4063

TV broadcasting in the trains of the Moscow Metro

News & Events
Press release

Tomsk, Russia, January 23, 2020. The Elecard company took part in the large-scale project on content preparation and broadcasting of 12 channels in the Moscow underground trains.

The Moscow Metro is the backbone of the Moscow transport system. It consists of 15 lines and 269 stations, on which more than 12 thousand trains are passed daily. There are 6200 video screens installed in the subway cars, which broadcast TV channels, information videos, and commercials. The monitors are designed for a large audience: more than 7 million people use the metro every day.

Elecard, SoftLab-NSK, and Stream Labs developed and implemented the hardware and software complex for preparation, broadcasting, and monitoring of TV channels in metro trains of 12 lines. This solution is based on the transcoder Elecard CodecWorks and high-density servers. CodecWorks supports H.265/HEVC, which is especially important in this project, as the communication bandwidth in the rolling stock is limited. HEVC allows broadcasting video of higher quality due to a higher degree of compression, as opposed to the AVC format. The solution guarantees stable broadcasting, as it includes redundancy of all system components. If an error occurs, the schema will automatically switch to the reserve source, and viewers will not notice a failure.

The Stream Labs provided the solution for the head-end station monitoring. The technologies of the SoftLab-NSK were used to implement the playout system. The solution supports targeted advertising adjusted for the content availability and duration. A playlist with a specific set of informational videos and commercials is prepared for each subway line. The system is integrated with external systems of advertising content delivery.

“ Metropolitan is a unique facility that has its own specifics in terms of standards and operation. It is important to understand and consider this in our work. We provided exclusive technical support during testing and implementation of the solution ," said Nikolay Milovanov, Elecard CEO.

" We came up with the task to implement broadcasting of media content with targeted advertising in Moscow Metro. We turned to Elecard with request to provide a high-quality software solution. The implemented solution allows us to broadcast not only commercials but also sports ans cultural events. On behalf of the company I would like to express my gratitude to Elecard employees for the project implementation and professional support at all stages of the system integration ," comments Maxim Shemegon, Development Director of the Moscow Metro State Unitary Enterprise.

Elecard CodecWorks is a professional software solution for real-time decoding, encoding, and transcoding into MPEG-2/AVC/HEVC with up to 16K resolution supporting multi-screen encoding and HLS/MPEG-DASH adaptive streaming technologies. CodecWorks has passed through comprehensive testing and guarantees high performance and continuous content delivery suitable for projects of any scale and complexity.

About Elecard Elecard provides software products for encoding, decoding, processing, receiving, and transmission of video and audio data in different formats (H.265/HEVC, H.264/AVC, MPEG-4, MPEG-2). Elecard is based in the United States, Canada, Russia, and Vietnam. For more information, please visit www.elecard.com. The company offers a wide range of reference designs for professional digital TV broadcasting market, which includes streaming, transcoding, video-on-demand servers, professional software products, and software development kits. Elecard is based in the United States, Russia, and Vietnam. For more information, please visit www.elecard.com.

Contacts: Tel.: +7 (3822) 488-585 [email protected]

About the Moscow Metro The Moscow Metro State Unitary Enterprise is an organization that provides rail transportation services for passengers in Moscow. It includes the Moscow Metro and the monorail. The Moscow Metro is the basis of the Moscow transport system, which consists of 15 lines and 269 stations.

Contacts: Tel.: +7 (495) 539-54-54

On the topic

Stay connected

IMAGES

Bridgestone Tour B330-RXS ball review
Bridgestone Tour B330-S Golfbälle Golfbälle 1 Dutzend kaufen
Bridgestone Tour B330 S Golf Balls (12 Balls)
Bridgestone Tour B-330
Bridgestone Tour B330 S Golf Balls (12 Balls)
Bridgestone Tour B330 RXS Golf Balls (1 Dozen) at InTheHoleGolf.com

VIDEO

Bentec Cluster Slider Перемещаемая буровая установка эшелонного типа
BMW G20 330e || Developing Soft Burble Tune by PSR Parts || Stage 3 Tuning
Q&A with Bridgestone Golf Staffer Billy Hurley III
Mercedes BRABUS E63 AMG B40S 800 W213 2021 REVS and Accelerations!
Bridgestone Tour BXS review. Another $50 a box golf ball!
Yoshino B330 SST

COMMENTS

Bridgestone Tour B330, B330-S, B3330-RX, B330-RXS Golf Ball Review
Each ball in the Tour B330 family has a unique feel. The B330 is the firmest, with a nice "thock" off the putter. The softest is the B330-RXS which comes off with a more mushy, buttery "thud.". The B330-S and B330-RX have distinct feels, but it's hard to definitively say which is softer. The B330-RX feels similar to the B330, but just ...
Bridgestone Tour B330-S: A Softy with Surprising Power
The Tour B330-S practically melts against the club, testing among the softest of all tour models. Feel is consistent from the driver to the putter, and we especially like the soft sensation on and around the greens. Off the tee: If there's a distance difference between the Tour B330-S and the standard model, its minuscule at most. This ball is ...
Bridgestone Golf Ball Compression Chart
It is also the right choice for golfers looking for performance and a good price. Bridgestone has a wide range of balls to suit different golfers, from the low compression B330, B330-S, e5, e7, to the medium compression e6 soft for beginners, the lady series for ladies and the tour BX for higher speeds. There are many more.
Bridgestone Tour B330: A Golf Ball that Does It All
The Tour B330 anchors Bridgestones tour lineup, with the B330-S, B330-RX and B330-RXS designed to optimize performance for players of different swing speeds and performance preferences. As of this writing, Brandt Snedeker, Fred Couples and Davis Love III are a few of the high-profile pros playing the Tour B330. This particular ball is engineered for golfers who swing the driver at 105 mph or ...
Bridgestone Tour B330-S
By Golf Monthly. published 7 April 2009. A four-piece ball that requires swing speed between 100 and 115 mph to get the most performance out of it. A soft core influences shots with the driver providing an explosive reaction off the face. An inner-mantle layer is also designed for distance, while an outer mantle helps players to work the ball.
Bridgestone Tour B330 Series Ball Review
The design of the ball's cover also is made to encourage a penetrating ball flight that is less affected by the wind. This year's Tour B330 golf balls also feature a new deconstructed cover that features a new dimple pattern and a softer urethane material. The Tour B330 and Tour B330-S also feature Bridgestone's new RD10 resin mantle layers.
Bridgestone B330 Golf Ball Review
For years, Bridgestone has carved a niche in the crowded golf ball market by offering a golf ball with Tour-like feel and consistency to those of us who cannot generate Tour-level clubhead speed. Having someone like Tiger Woods playing the ball in competition cements the brand's credibility but what sets Bridgestone apart from other competitors is its myriad options in the B330 series and ...
Bridgestone B330 & B330-s Balls
In the head to head competition, the B-330 was longer, firmer and spun less, but I scored better and approached closer with the B-330 S. I found both balls to be rather durable. I think the new grooves help, but Bridgestone has always done a good job of making a very durable urethane cover. The only scuffing came from the cart path, and no ball ...
Bridgestone B330/B330S Ball Review
The B330 and B330-S use a softer, thinner urethane cover to improve feel and distance; the RX models feature a softer ionomer blend in the mantle layer designed to reduce sidespin. Verdict: Bridgestone still makes the best case for using non-tour-speed balls (not that its elite balls are slouches, though). Still, even our fastest swingers liked ...
Bridgestone 2012 Tour B330 Series Ball Review
The Tour B330 is 6% softer and the TourB330-S is 13% softer than 2011's design. The softer cover layer enhances green side control because of increased spin. Since Bridgestone is thinning out the cover they also have to make the core of the golf ball larger. This new design is called the Gradational Compression Core.
Bridgestone Tour B330-S Hydro Core Golf Balls Review
For the majority of us who swing a driver at less than 105mph, the B330-RX is designed for players seeking more distance off the tee, while the B330-RXS offers more greenside spin. Details: £47.99 per dozen. www.bridgestonegolf.co.uk. Key Features: NEW Hydro Core optimized for swings speeds above 105 mph. Reengineered Dual Mantle design ...
Bridgestone Tour B330-RXS ball review
Key Technology: Bridgestone Tour B330-RXS ball review. The new B-Series balls are designed to match swing speeds of all types of golfer. Hydro Core Technology means the core is softer in the centre and firmer in the outer region for reduced spin off the tee, resulting in added distance. The RXS is designed specifically for players with swing ...
Golf Ball Compression Guide
Golf ball compression is a measure of how much a golf ball deforms under load. The higher the compression, the harder the ball. It should be noted that there isn't a single industry-standard gauge and even gauges of the same type can produce slightly different measurements, so it's not uncommon for one manufacturers 90 to be another's 87 ...
Ball Lab: Bridgestone TOUR B XS Review (2022)
On our gauge, the Bridgestone TOUR B XS has an average compression of 84. Unsurprisingly, the closest comp in our database is the prior-gen TOUR B XS which also measured 84. That's the same as the Maxfli Tour and just a touch softer than the 2021 Titleist Pro V1. Diameter and Weight
Bridgestone Tour B330 Golf Ball Compression
The Bridgestone Tour B330 golf ball is designed for golfers who prioritize distance, control, and overall performance. While the exact compression rating for the Tour B330 is not publicly disclosed by Bridgestone, it is generally considered to have a compression in the mid-to-high range. The Tour B330 features a multi-layer construction that ...
Bridgestone Golf Balls Tour Series
TOUR B X Tiger Woods Edition. $49.99 TOUR B Golf Balls with new REACTIV Cover. Looking for more? View all Bridgestone golf balls or find a golf retailer near you. See all balls Find a retailer. Products. Balls; Clubs; Style; Licensed logo balls; Custom balls; Promotions; Knowledge.
First Look: 2018 Bridgestone Tour B Golf Balls
The new Bridgestone Tour B X and XS balls come in white only and will have an MSRP of $44.99 per dozen, which is the same as the B330 and B330 S. The Tour B RX and RXS balls also have an MSRP of $44.99 per dozen, which is a $5 per dozen price increase of the B330 versions. Both will be available in white, with the RX also available in Optic Yellow.
Machine-Building Plant (Elemash)
In 1954, Elemash began to produce fuel assemblies, including for the first nuclear power plant in the world, located in Obninsk. In 1959, the facility produced the fuel for the Soviet Union's first icebreaker. Its fuel assembly production became serial in 1965 and automated in 1982. 1. Today, Elemash is one of the largest TVEL nuclear fuel ...
Ball Lab
Bridgestone Tour B RX - Compression. On our gauge, the average compression of the Bridgestone Tour B RX is 75. That's solidly 10 compression points softer than the Tour B XS and nearly 25 points softer than the Tour B X. It shouldn't surprise anyone to learn that the most similar ball (compression-wise) we have in our database is the ...
Moscow Metro Tour with Friendly Local Guides
Description Moscow Metro private tours. 2-hour tour $87: 10 Must-See Moscow Metro stations with hotel pick-up and drop-off 3-hour tour $137: 20 Must-See Moscow Metro stations with Russian lunch in beautifully-decorated Metro Diner + hotel pick-up and drop off. Metro pass is included in the price of both tours. Highlight of Metro Tour
Geographic coordinates of Elektrostal, Moscow Oblast, Russia
The coordinates of a location within each zone are defined as a planar coordinate pair related to the intersection of the equator and the zone's central meridian, and measured in meters. Elevation above sea level is a measure of a geographic location's height. We are using the global digital elevation model GTOPO30.
Ball Lab: 2022 Bridgestone TOUR B RXS Review
At the time of review, the 2022 Bridgestone TOUR B RXS receives a Ball Lab score of 75. That's a couple of ticks better than the database average (73) at the time of testing. FILTER AND SORT. *Scores and ratings are relative to the other balls in the database. As the database grows and calculations are updated, vales will change.
TV broadcasting in the trains of the Moscow Metro
The Elecard company took part in the large-scale project on content preparation and broadcasting of 12 channels in the Moscow underground trains.

Bridgestone Tour B330, B330-S, B3330-RX, B330-RXS Golf Ball Review

50 Words or Less

Introduction

Who This Ball Is For

Buy Bridgestone Golf Balls HERE

20 Comments

Leave a Comment Cancel

Plugged In Golf

Do You Like Free Golf Gear?

Bridgestone Golf Ball Compression Chart and Rank

Bridgestone Golf Ball Compression Chart

What you want to know about Bridgestone golf ball is here!

Related Articles

Estimate Shipping

Add A Coupon

Bridgestone B330 Golf Ball Review

Key Features

Bridgestone B330S Golf Ball Review

Bridgestone B330 RX Golf Ball Review

Bridgestone B330RXS Golf Ball Review

Which one is Right for Me?

Are the Bridgestone balls really as good as the other guys?

Review: Bridgestone B330 & B330-s Balls

Ball Reviews

You may like

Is the Future of Golf Balls Lower Spin?

Looking to the future

Review: Callaway Chrome Soft X Golf Balls

What’s New in the Chrome Soft X

Performance

60-degree full wedge shots

6-iron shots

Driver shots

Around the Green

The Takeaway

Review: Callaway Chrome Soft golf balls

Around the green

The Wedge Guy: Golf mastery begins with your wedge game

Tour pro calls Anthony Kim a ‘f*****g idiot’ following Instagram comeback post

Anthony Kim WITB 2024 (February)

This Rory McIlroy post-round ‘The Match’ moment is going viral…but all is likely not what it seems

Scottie Scheffler WITB 2024 (March)

Photos from the 2024 Arnold Palmer Invitational

Anthony Kim’s speculated LIV Golf sign-on fee may surprise you

The total sum that Sergio Garcia needs to pay in fines if he wants to return to DP World Tour revealed

Raul Pereda WITB 2024 (April)

Rickie Fowler WITB 2024 (April)

Callum McNeill WITB 2024 (April)

Jimmy Stanger WITB 2024 (April)

Bridgestone 2012 Tour B330 Series Ball Review

Share this with your golf buddies:

12 thoughts on “Bridgestone 2012 Tour B330 Series Ball Review”

Leave a Reply

Bridgestone Tour B330-S Hydro Core Golf Balls Review

At a glance

What we say...

Product Information

Bridgestone Tour B330-RXS ball review

Key Technology: Bridgestone Tour B330-RXS ball review

Get the Golf Monthly Newsletter

Top 100 Equipment News

Bridgestone Tour B330 Golf Ball Compression

Golf Ball Compression Chart and Rank

Share This Page

Pete Styles PGA Pro Instructor

Moscow Metro Tour

Description

Highlight of Metro Tour

Hotel Pick-up

Museum of Moscow Metro

Fun facts from our Moscow Metro Tours:

Coffee Ring

Zodiac Metro

Paleontological finds

What you get:

Write your review

Geographic coordinates of Elektrostal, Moscow Oblast, Russia

Coordinates of Elektrostal in decimal degrees

Elektrostal , Moscow Oblast, Russia

Ball Lab: 2022 Bridgestone TOUR B RXS Review